Compare SWIFTnet FIN vs. TrueCommerce EDI

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
569 views|488 comparisons
TrueCommerce EDI Logo
829 views|712 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules.
Top Answer: I would like for them to work in real-time.
Top Answer: Our company sells this product to our clients and also integrates them into a client's environment. In most cases, it's the integration of systems, of interfaces with IBM MQ or Insights.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

TrueCommerce gives your organisation the competitive edge with a robust, scalable and cost effective managed service that harnesses the power of our leading trading partner platform.

Redefining the electronic exchange of messages between organisations across all sectors, TrueCommerce empowers your company to achieve new levels of business connectivity and performance with the world’s most advanced trading partner solution.

Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Learn more about TrueCommerce EDI
Sample Customers
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, VolvoDigital Blue Inc., Mobi Technologies Inc., Digital Blue Inc., Blu Pharmaceuticals, CIPA USA, Mama Rosies Co. Inc., Fly Boys Inc., Roma Marble Inc., Claudias Canine Cuisine
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while TrueCommerce EDI is ranked 10th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0, while TrueCommerce EDI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". On the other hand, SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct, whereas TrueCommerce EDI is most compared with SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), OpenText Trading Grid, SEEBURGER BIS, Informatica Cloud B2B Gateway and OpenText Alloy.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.