Compare TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid vs. Uniface

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
62
Comparisons
45
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
286
Comparisons
157
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Compuware Uniface
Learn More
Overview
Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that lets you transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications.

Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

Offer
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Learn more about Uniface
Sample Customers
Alestra, E-Plus, T-Mobile USA, Vodafone Hutchison Australia
BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is ranked 32nd in Application Infrastructure while Uniface is ranked 26th in Application Infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is rated 0.0, while Uniface is rated 0.0. On the other hand, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is most compared with , whereas Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.