Compare Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Uniface
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use Uniface? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2021. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: Proven solution with valuable customization. Top Answer: The pricing is a bit expensive. Top Answer: Nothing in particular comes to mind in terms of improvement. It's a proven solution and it really depends on the resources that a company has for maintenance once a solution is in place. That said, it… more » | Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Ranking  | |
Views 2,218 Comparisons 1,309 Reviews 13 Average Words per Review 603 Rating 8.6 | Views 300 Comparisons 173 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Compuware Uniface | |
Learn | |
| Microsoft | Uniface |
Overview | |
| .NET Framework is a software framework that runs primarily on Microsoft Windows. It includes a large class library named Framework Class Library (FCL) and provides language interoperability across several programming languages. Programs written for .NET Framework execute in a software environment named Common Language Runtime (CLR), an application virtual machine that provides services such as security, memory management, and exception handling. FCL and CLR together constitute .NET Framework. | Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Microsoft .NET Framework | Learn more about Uniface |
Sample Customers | |
| Curtin University, Rockwell Automation, Aruba Networks, Insurity Inc., City of Barcelona, Pennsylvania DCNR, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, A1 Telekom Austria AG, Eastman Chemical Company | BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven |
Top Industries | |
Comms Service Provider28% Computer Software Company23% Government6% Insurance Company6% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business47% Midsize Enterprise13% Large Enterprise40% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 13 reviews while Uniface is ranked 26th in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.6, while Uniface is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Has improved our efficiency in the time it takes to program a solution". On the other hand, Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and Oracle SOA Suite, whereas Uniface is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.