Compare Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Uniface

Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews while Uniface which is ranked 27th in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.6, while Uniface is rated 0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Supports our development of multiple in-house applications and systems". On the other hand, Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, IBM WebSphere Application Server and Apache Web Server, whereas Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Uniface? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Oracle and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: August 2019.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Do your homework. Consider the partnership program.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,952
Comparisons
930
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
407
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
713
Comparisons
174
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 80% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
Compuware Uniface
Learn
Microsoft
Uniface
Overview
.NET Framework is a software framework that runs primarily on Microsoft Windows. It includes a large class library named Framework Class Library (FCL) and provides language interoperability across several programming languages. Programs written for .NET Framework execute in a software environment named Common Language Runtime (CLR), an application virtual machine that provides services such as security, memory management, and exception handling. FCL and CLR together constitute .NET Framework.

Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft .NET Framework
Learn more about Uniface
Sample Customers
Curtin University, Rockwell Automation, Aruba Networks, Insurity Inc., City of Barcelona, Pennsylvania DCNR, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, A1 Telekom Austria AG, Eastman Chemical CompanyBMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Oracle and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: August 2019.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email