• Home
  • Actian NoSQL Object Database vs. TigerLogic XDMS

Actian NoSQL Object Database vs TigerLogic XDMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Lakshmi Narayanan Duraisamy
User-friendly, easy to maintain and open source; lacks a dedicated UI-based interface
Use TigerLogic XDMS?
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about Actian NoSQL Object Database?
Top Answer:The database schema is easy to define, manipulate and duplicate with respect to objects.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Actian NoSQL Obje...
Top Answer:This is an open-source solution so no licensing fees apply.
What needs improvement with Actian NoSQL Object Database?
Top Answer:The solution currently lacks a dedicated UI-based interface. We currently have to rely on third-party clients to manage the database and connect remotely with SQL. Unfortunately, NoSQL doesn't have… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
212
Comparisons
117
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
406
Rating
7.0
18th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
26
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Versant ODBMS
Learn More
Actian
Video Not Available
TigerLogic
Video Not Available
Overview
Actian NoSQL object technology enables software developers to handle database requirements for extremely complex object models with ease and is used by the world’s largest companies for applications with very large scale data management requirements. Actian NoSQL doesn’t need mapping code to store or retrieve objects, so schema modifications can be handled without application downtime. Fault tolerance, synchronous and asynchronous replication, high availability and excellent scalability make Actian NoSQL ready for the enterprise.
TigerLogic XDMS is an enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology: a data model that is optimal for managing and storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its extensible XQuery Engine.
Sample Customers
Pediatrix Medical Group, Pinnergy, The Rohatyn Group, Henry Schein, Groupe Adeo, Zoho, TimoCom, Xactly
Arts Management Systems, Future Chalk Software, Tek Service Srl, Just Software bvba, Senex, Am_tiq AG, CNM, WigaSoft AG, 24 ore software, Abraxas Juris AG, TheDataManager, Catalina Software, The Conrad Company, ADJob Nordic AB, J+D Software, Enviro Data, The International Education and Training Corporation, 888 Software Products Srl, Instinct Systems

Actian NoSQL Object Database is ranked 1st in Non-Relational Databases with 1 review while TigerLogic XDMS is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases. Actian NoSQL Object Database is rated 7.0, while TigerLogic XDMS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Actian NoSQL Object Database writes " User-friendly, easy to maintain and open source; lacks a dedicated UI-based interface". On the other hand, Actian NoSQL Object Database is most compared with Actian Versant FastObjects and Matisse, whereas TigerLogic XDMS is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.