• Home
  • Uniface vs. Windows Process Activation Services

Uniface vs Windows Process Activation Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Uniface and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Uniface?
Anonymous User
Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support
Ranking
24th
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
183
Comparisons
139
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
231
Comparisons
179
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Compuware Uniface
Learn More
Uniface
Microsoft
Overview

Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

Windows Process Activation Service generalizes the Internet Information Services (IIS) process model, removing the dependency on HTTP. All the features of IIS that were previously available only to HTTP applications are now available to applications hosting Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) services, by using non-HTTP protocols. IIS 7.0 also uses Windows Process Activation Service for message-based activation over HTTP.
Sample Customers
BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Harris Farm Markets, The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, John Keells Holdings, Green Prefab, 343 Industries, SM Prime, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Uniface is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. Uniface is rated 0.0, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and IIS.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.