WSO2 Carbon [EOL] vs Windows Server AppFabric comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
293 views|182 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Windows Server AppFabric and WSO2 Carbon [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is expensive, and its licensing is a bit confusing."
  • "The product is affordable, in my opinion."
  • More Windows Server AppFabric Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's deployment phase was very easy.
    Top Answer:The product is unable to connect with different cloud services. The product should be able to connect with different cloud services. The aforementioned improvement in the product can make the… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    293
    Comparisons
    182
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Carbon
    Learn More
    WSO2
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Windows Server AppFabric extends Windows Server to provide enhanced hosting, management, and caching capabilities for Web applications and middle-tier services. The AppFabric hosting features add service management extensions to Internet Information Services (IIS), Windows Process Activation Service (WAS), and the .NET Framework 4. This includes Hosting Services and Hosting Administration tools that make it easier to deploy, configure, and manage Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) based services. The AppFabric caching features add a distributed, in-memory object cache to Windows Server that makes it easier to scale out high-performance .NET applications, especially ASP.NET applications.

    WSO2 Carbon redefines middleware by providing an integrated and componentized middleware platform that adapts to the specific needs of any enterprise IT project - on premise or in the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    OSIsoft
    Bdigital, M-creations, Yenlo, Codenvy, Ohio Automobile Club
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Windows Server AppFabric is ranked 18th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Windows Server AppFabric is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Windows Server AppFabric writes "Offers good monitoring capabilities and ease of setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Carbon [EOL] writes "It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs". Windows Server AppFabric is most compared with IIS, whereas WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.