Cybereason is stable. We haven't had any hiccups or outages so far. 

The product is 95% stable.

They have an awesome technical product. They are still catching up on the customer side, but they are working hard at it. I have seen a lot of improvements already.

Stability can definitely be improved for a cloud service. You expect a certain amount of uptime and you expect when they're doing upgrades on the system, that it's going to be transparent to the end-users. But with their current configuration, if they do an upgrade on our servers, we have seven hours of down time.

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has good stability.

So far, I would give them 10 out of 10 on stability.

It is a stable solution.

I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution is quite stable. We haven't had any issues with it. It doesn't have bugs or glitches. It doesn't freeze or crash. I would consider it to be reliable. I can always access the console, I can check stuff. I don't have issues.

We're on version 19.1, and we're waiting on version 20.1 to be used a bit more and become a bit more stable before we upgrade. We're a pretty complex organization. Cybereason told us to hold off for a bit, and so we aren't changing versions just yet. 

I didn't like the stability. There were some problems and it was not responding correctly to integration.

The performance was better than the endpoint detection response of our previous solution. We've actually had comments from end-users once we deployed Cybereason, and we noticed the outgoing solution that their computers have increased in speed.

The solution has been very stable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable. The performance has been good overall.

There are no issues with the stability of the product.

I have the utmost respect for the stability of this solution, as it will be ninety-nine percent solid in keeping the endpoints protected from advanced cyber attacks.