F5 Silverline DDoS Protection Room for Improvement

Reza Torabi
Senior Network Engineer at PECCO
The reporting should be much better because it's really hard to generate reports with F5. We export the reports to other file extensions and then have to import them in order to create a graph. The reporting should be much, much better. The TM (Traffic Management) shell also needs improvement. You need to have Linux knowledge in order to use the shell. The user interface could be better, as well. We have complaints about the reliability of this solution. However, because we are in Iran and there are licensing restrictions, we cannot use other, more recognized products, such as the Palo Alto Networks Firewall, or Cisco. We also cannot use cloud-based security because of sanctions. View full review »
Manager at a comms service provider
The product could be improved on the global load and the integration with the other solution like Cisco and Dell EMC. As a representer of the operation, we prefer to have one platform which can accommodate all types of integration. We are also looking for more improvements in the security policy configuration. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Arbor Networks, Imperva and others in DDoS. Updated: December 2019.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email