HashiCorp Vault Room for Improvement
In my opinion, HashiCorp Vault could improve its user interface. Right now, they don't offer much in terms of a graphical interface, which means you usually have to manage things manually through API calls. I think CyberArk has a better approach because it provides a UI that integrates features across all its components, making it easier, especially for new users or those from organizations with strict licensing policies.
View full review »B
BernardParinas
Consultant at Accenture
The onboarding is a challenge. It should be more self-service, but it involves reviews and approvals.
View full review »There is room for improvement in stability.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Password Managers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HashiCorp, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The product needs to improve its customization. It should be also more like easy to plug and play.
View full review »There could be a plugin for the database to change the secret automatically. It would be an efficient feature for password security.
View full review »MA
Mohamed Anees
Lead DevOps Engineer at Etisalat
I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube.
View full review »The product is complicated to install. It could be easier. Additionally, its pricing model needs improvement.
View full review »SU
reviewer1566825
Senior Manager Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
They should include automation features for the solution's implementation process. It will make the deployment simple.
View full review »NM
reviewer1591359
Project Manager at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Its cost can be improved. It is really pricey, but to be fair, it did everything that we wanted it to do. Because of our requirements for high availability, redundancy, and resiliency, we needed a lot of clusters and a lot of nodes. We needed a massive architecture and the price of it was so inhibitive. It was going to cost us over a quarter of a million a year.
In terms of features, the only thing that I found a little bit hinky was that there was no revocation or deletion on the model we were using. Once in a financial year, a client interacts, and you pay for that client for the year. So, there are just little things like that in the pricing. There should be more clarity around the end of the key. I know there is no system like this. They all are the same. I tested Microsoft, Google, and some others, and none of them really want you to delete a key, which makes sense. You delete a key, and you lose everything that it has wrapped or encrypted, but it's actually just a language. Deletion isn't really deletion. It's really revocation, but overall, HashiCorp Vault ticked all the boxes for us, and I couldn't fault it.
RB
RamanaBhavaraju
Founder & Principal Architect at NCompas Business Solutions Inc.
We could use more documentation, primarily to do with integrations. Anybody who uses HashiCorp integrates with a public cloud, like Azure or AWS. Azure and AWS have their own secret management; how does this collaboration work between the key vault of HashiCorp to the key vault of Azure? Some of this documentation is not up to mark.
View full review »It would be helpful to have more advanced features.
View full review »BP
reviewer2262933
Teaching Assistant at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products.
View full review »MK
ManishKumar10
Cloud Architect
We found that Microsoft Azure Vault is better due to the fact that it has integration with all of the Azure services.
It would be better if it integrated more broadly with cloud API such as Amazon Web services, et cetera.
The error handling could be a bit better.
The technical support was hard to get a hold of and lacking in service.
The initial setup could be simplified.
View full review »SD
Sylvain Déjardin
TechOps Engineer - Middleware & Containers specialist at EBRC -European Business Reliance Centre
A Service Mesh workflow connected within Vault workflow would be difficult to integrate, depending on the SI complexity and security compliance.
A drawback for some clients who have to be PCI compliant is that they still need to use and subscribe to an HSM (Hardware Security Module) solution.
Compliance: www.pcicomplianceguide.org
SN
Satty
Cloud Solutions Architect
The documentation is very general; it should have more examples and more use cases. Basically, they just tell you the syntax without a better explanation of how to do things.
We learned all of the Vault Commands (CLI) and they work fine, except when we are running on an EKS cluster then the syntax changes. Most of the commands are not working.
View full review »RS
Ruwan Senarathne
Technical Lead at Fortude.co
The solution could be much easier to implement. We are trying to implement it now.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Password Managers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HashiCorp, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.