The most valuable aspects of this solution are:
- Fast caching
- Improved database performance
The most valuable aspects of this solution are:
They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive.
We have been using it for the last two to three years.
It requires a lot of resources, man power, and DB power, to make it stable.
It is scalable.
The initial setup is complex. They want to achieve what Oracle is offering. Oracle offers everything under one umbrella inn one offering. Whereas if I go for PostgreSQL I have to buy a small component separately from a third-party vendor.
I would recommend In-Memory because it is a robust and scalable RDBMS. We are able to achieve high availability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten.
They should improve the licensing cost.
The most valuable features are its real time performance and consistency.
We are not using it for our internal systems, but rather for our customer solutions. We can provide a high standard with this solution to our customers by using such products.
We are waiting for new features in the next release.
Stability is very good.
Scalability is also very good.
Technical support from Oracle is fantastic. We have been working with Oracle very closely and we are very satisfied with their performance.
We had started to use this solution from the beginning. We haven't switched from another solution. When selecting a vendor, we want someone who has a long term road map. This demonstrates sustainability.
The initial setup was not complex. It was no problem at all and it was straightforward.
We haven't used other vendors. We have a long relationship with Oracle and we have had a good experience with them in the past.
I recommend using this solution, just as we are using it.
The most valuable feature of Database In-Memory is that it's really fast. We need very fast transactions that occur in the milliseconds. We've had a lot of traditional solutions that we've had to throw out, losing a lot of money in the process, in deciding to go with Database In-Memory. For us, it's proven to be very fast.
We can get analytics very, very quickly without needing to direct data to separate databases or change our applications.
It's good and it functions, but it's not the easiest add-on to Database to work with. It's still new, so hopefully it'll be improved in later versions.
We started with Database In-Memory probably a a few months ago.
We didn't have any issues deploying it.
The numbers show that it's very stable and very promising for high-transaction, low-latency systems.
We haven't needed to scale it yet in the two months we've been using it.
There was no such software for Database prior to this.
The initial setup was pretty straightforward.
We implemented it with our in-house team.