We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

More CockroachDB Pros »

"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot.""The solution is very fast.""The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data.""The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database""The application development is very user-friendly."

More Oracle Database In-Memory Pros »

Cons
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

More CockroachDB Cons »

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature.""The solution is quite expensive.""Technical support is below our expectations currently. It could be improved.""They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive.""The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."

More Oracle Database In-Memory Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
4,957
Comparisons
3,785
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
313
Rating
6.0
9th
Views
2,461
Comparisons
2,014
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
438
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about CockroachDB
Learn more about Oracle Database In-Memory
Sample Customers
Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias
Shanghai Customs
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company19%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm11%
Local Government11%
Retailer11%
Insurance Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CockroachDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 1 review while Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 9th in Relational Databases with 5 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 6.0, while Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Simple to deploy and the support is good, but better features for high availability are needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "Easy to deploy and has good performance". CockroachDB is most compared with Citus Data, SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, MariaDB, SQL Server, IBM Db2 Database and IBM Informix.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.