RSA NetWitness Network could improve scalability. The process is simple you can stack on devices. It can scale horizontally and vertically.

NetWitness Endpoint scales well.

The solution is highly scalable and is easy to scale.

When comparing RSA NetWitness Endpoint to Splunk, we have found Splunk is missing some features. For example, the user identity and analytics capabilities are not available with Splunk. You will have to depends on third-party tools to provide those features. What makes Splunk very good is that it is dependent on third parties but all those third parties have to integrate together. Splunk should have someone who is very good at API integration to be able to integrate all the third-party tools, otherwise, the solution will not work well.

We have approximately six people using this solution in my organization.

It's not a very scalable product.

We have three engineers that work on the solution. They use it regularly, yet not necessarily on a daily basis. 

It's a scalable solution. We have around five to eight customers using RSA NetWitness Endpoint, and we hope to increase the number of users.

RSA NetWitness Endpoint is a scalable solution. However, the problem which we normally face is in terms of the migration of the solution. This solution has hard-coded IP addresses in its agents. When somebody wants to migrate from one data center to another data center, they have to reinstall all the agents. They can't change the hard-coded IP address to allow communication with the target server. That is the largest problem of the solution. Otherwise, in terms of scalability, it's fine.

If they are able to provide provisioning of the IP address change in the agents only when somebody migrates the hardware appliances from one data center to another data center. It would be a great improvement for those who want to migrate.

NetWitness Endpoint is very scalable.

The solution is scalable. It creates 3,000 lab logs per second. I think the solution is suitable for large companies, or medium to large companies.

The solution is scalable in terms of coverage. We have more than 2500 endpoints with different levels of users and operating systems. 

The solution is highly scalable. Users just need to install the agent on the products. Right now, we have about 1,000 users. We use the solution daily.

It is not meant for small businesses. It is for medium to very large enterprises.

It is highly scalable. It can be bought based on your requirements.

It does not scale. It's one network segment that captures all of the traffic, so it's not scalable at all.

We have six analysts who use this product, with maybe only three or four people in our company.

I think it would scale nicely but we have not needed to expand our organizational needs yet.