New Relic Reviews

The ability to have real-time performance statistics, as we need to know if the main features of our website are working and responding fast enough to our clients' clicks.

New Relic helped us in realizing that sometimes our online service wasn't as fast and reliable as we expected it to be. With the help of New Relic tools, our organization was able to detect, track, and fix errors in our website, so we focused our efforts in these areas.

The pricing model. New Relic can be expensive for growing startups. Maybe they should think of some more choices.

I've used it for two years.

Not at all.

No, access to the New Relic website and reports was always stable. Monitoring, events and reports are always available and we didn't notice any kind of downtime.

No, our website started with a small number of users and grew to hundreds. New Relic was always working as expected.

Customer service has always answered our questions very quickly, even on weekends. It seems very effective. 10/10.

We previously tried some hosted solutions using a variety of tools to perform monitoring and reporting tasks. We decided to switch to New Relic for its simplicity on setup and maintenance. We are able to quickly deploy new servers using New Relic in zero time.

New Relic offers great tools to integrate your software stack with their tools, and everything worked like a charm.

We implemented New Relic ourselves

Pricing can be dangerous if your product grows a lot. You should start with the free lite option to see if you can find New Relic useful for your application, and then try the Pro version with one or more hosts.

No other options evaluated,

Search in the plugins repository to see if there's already a package for your CMS framework. Install que iOS/Android mobile app to monitor your sites and get alerts.

From operationally rich, to developer deep. Invites dev and ops to work together, most operational APM tools don't invite the dev. Most easily adopted APM tool. For innovators first, then the rest of the Org will start to "Get It".

It is a SaaS service and this creates internal friction that needs innovative solutions (but you have to own that).ROI is very high because a single SKU product is rare in APM today, and the ability to move licenses anywhere is an amazing agility quotient.

ROI - found key issues in the first month in the biggest Alexa-rated site that we own.

New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided.

I have been using New Relic APM for approximately six years.

The stability of New Relic APM is very good.

The scalability of New Relic APM is good. We have not had any issue with scalability when we use different types of loads, it worked very well.

The technical support from New Relic APM is very good.

The ROI from using New Relic APM is good.

I rate New Relic APM an eight out of ten.

We were using New Relic Synthetics to test our application, which retrieved data from the web on a daily basis. Our second use case was that it helped us to isolate any bad code.

You put the hooks in for the website as a database, and you can drill down into all of the offending code. You can even go down into the SQL. We were running an Oracle database and I was the DBA, so the SQL level was my responsibility.

The most valuable feature was drill-downs. I was able to use it to drill-down into the SQL, get the response time, as well as the allocation based on IO, CPU, and the other resources attached to the SQL queries.

We were able to integrate with the messaging tool, Slack, which meant that we got notifications whenever something was not quite right.

There are certain features that are not supported in New Relic, such as CATSEARCH, which allows you to do a full-text search. Certain things like this would have helped me a little bit.

We used New Relic Synthetics for at least a year, up until the end of 2019.

It's a stable solution and we never had a problem with it.

Prior to New Relic, we were using some Oracle tools such as AWR. Although they were useful, they were not really proactive. New Relic is a more proactive tool, as it were.

I was not involved in the initial setup, but it was done in-house by one person. It took at least half a week to complete it. This included setting up the service, and Slack integration. It took a nice amount of time, in total.

I loved this product, but we can no longer afford it, so we dropped it.

Honestly, at first, I was very hesitant about using this product. My advice is to learn to use it and learn all of the features because it has many of them, not all of which are documented, but they work wonders. For us, they really helped a lot.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use it for monitoring the CPU, memory, services, email rates, etc.

We monitor the Internet daily, or every few days. Then, every time there is a crisis, high traffic, or if we see a problem with a server, we go to New Relic and monitor it to determine the cause.

• The APM
• Monitoring
• The capabilities which allow you to easily see whatever you are looking for.

• I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues.
• I would like more deep dive monitoring into services and being able to install it on some apps.

One to three years.

It is stable. We don't have any issues.

The scalability is good. We have a few thousand servers, and it is up and down based on the traffic and need. We have New Relic on all of our servers.

We don't use the technical support.

The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment was quite easy.

We have it integrated mostly with our physical servers.

The product saves time and money.

Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy. The product is easy to deploy and manage, which is why our company purchased through the AWS Marketplace.

The pricing could be better. We did not purchase the full version. Maybe if we applied all the other features of the full version of New Relic, we could get all the features that we feel are missing.

In addition to New Relic, we evaluated Monitis and Dynatrace. We chose New Relic because it was cheaper for us as a startup, and it is also faster and more user-friendly.

Go with it. It is a good product. It gives us the visibility that we need in monitoring.

The AWS version is easier to deploy than the on-premise version.

We used it more heavily before Synthetics came, but it’s kind of like Synthetics, but used domestically.

It allows us to perform threshold testing to see how quickly transactions are getting out to customers, providing us with data such as response time and adequacy.

Our software does significant data queries, so we throttle performance according to region just to keep the application up. Now we can open it up completely because of New Relic tools.

Ability to quickly identify different browser usage performance issues across our application functions. Again saves time in coding to enhance the end user experience.

It enables us to fine-tune our application quicker. It's also better if we find issues in our application than if our customers find it.

It also prevents performance issues because we're able to see potential issues before they cause real problems.

I can't recommend any improvements to Browser. I really can’t find anything that I don’t like about these apps.

Deployment was very simple.

We've encountered no issues with stability.

Scaling has not been a problem.

I've not had to use technical support.

We had no problems setting it up.

It's schema-less and unconstrained to queries. And although NRQL isn’t as expressive as SQL, we're able to implement a solution that uses New Relic's API to provide data so the project manager can query it using NRQL.

They announced that they’re expanding a GUI to make NRQL even less technical.

Helped us understand that we had a professional group of our users that we didn’t even know about.

It identified mechanized behavior (e.g. bots) and then blocked them.

Raw transaction didn’t give us data that we needed. We needed user information so we needed to supply the data with an API.

It’s built to stay up. We starting sending a ton of data to them. They were able to deal with it on their end given their internal architecture. We had a marketing partnership with them.

It’s responsive. When I have had questions, we used the forum. As a big customer, we get a response within a few hours.

Our CTO came back from a conference last year and we were trying to solve a problem using DynamoDB, S3 and Redis (trying to solve the user segmentation question and analyze user behavior). Within a few hours of implementing the API, I was able to query for what we needed. You could do a lot with elastic search, but that needs a team of three people.

No complexity. Just an API call.

They charge by the number of events and for the retention.

We use New Relic for monitoring and alerts. 

We detect issues using dashboards that we built on New Relic. For example, if our drivers are taking too long to get rides, we usually detect the problem using New Relic dashboards.

The user experience with dashboards and the machine learning features are its most valuable features. The dashboards are useful for BI and fraud detection, if implemented the right way.

The APIs could be better. I would also like more APIs and features to integrate with streaming solutions, like Kinesis or Kafka.

One to three years.

The stability is good. Because it is calibrated for SaaS, it is transparent for us.

The scalability is good because it is SaaS.

The technical support is good.

The integration and configuration was good for our containers and LAN disks.

The detection piece of it brings us a big return on investment.

Splunk and Dynatrace are the alternatives in the market. New Relic is the solution that our company purchased.

I have used another product at my company called Dynatrace. Though, I think New Relic is better because its dashboard is more intuitive for users. I use Dynatrace at my company because we have a partnership with them.

New Relic is the best choice because the product has good dashboards, scalability, and environments.