Pega BPM Reviews

Our use case of this solution is for clinical case management. I'm the senior vice president of the company and we are customers and end users of Pega BPM. 

The solution has assisted us by automating our workflow. It supports the process management of medication therapy engagements with patients. 

We appreciate that this solution supports the size and scale that we need.

This is a very expensive product and there is a lack of availability of the Pega skill sets, the resources. 

I've been using this solution for 10 years. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable, we have around 1,000 users and don't have any plans to increase that number. 

We deployed ourselves and I don't recall any issues. The solution is not maintenance heavy and we have a few people responsible for upkeep. 

Licensing costs are very high. 

It's important to check all options and ascertain that this is the appropriate solution for you. There are other features that products like Camunda provide,   but as you need to scale and get more sophisticated in your process management, Pega becomes a better option.

I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process. Maybe a very simple example could be a loan approval process where you need to upload your documents and have them be verified by users. In other words, you have a methodical process in place that encompasses reviews. It can be anything, it might be an order that you have placed on Amazon which needs to go through another. Anything that involves a methodical process is a good fit for Pega as a product.

What I found the most valuable is the case management and the UI design capabilities. We have the ability to do any kind of integration on Pega, which is really beneficial. 

I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something. It is a little bit difficult to comprehend, which can be a challenge for the developers who manage the solution because they will have a hard time getting people to use it. For example, if several business users start developing an application at the same time, bottlenecks can happen and the developer will have to go in and kill the conflict in the rules that they have created. That could be better streamlined, which means there is room for improvement there.

I have been using this solution since 2010.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the scalability of this solution a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate their support a five, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. There are lags in their responses.

Neutral

My impression is that the initial setup process has to be followed via documentation. It's becoming a little bit less complicated, but it is still not easy for an inexperienced user to kickstart and deploy. The deployment an hour and a half at most. It can be deployed by one person. 

I would rate this process a six, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

The pricing is a bit costly. Although it is a little bit costlier than all other tools on the market, it is more consistent. It also shortens the time to go live by quite a bit.

As far as maintaining this solution goes, how extensive it is will depend on whether or not you will be maintaining just Pega. It allows you to delegate many of the business rules to business users where they themselves can actually go and configure their rules and modify them. A user can have their own dedicated set of rules that they can go and configure. 

Overall, I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

For an upcoming project, my manager told us to look at all the different capabilities between the Pega, Appian, and the Camunda. We don't know the use case yet. We need to know the use case, however, at this point, we are just exploring different tools, BPM tools.

The integration is good. It can be capable of different integrations. 

There is a Pega Decision Hub, which is just a text-based analytical site. Based upon the text-based analytics and it can decide and trigger a case.

There are a lot of new features in Pega that are great.

I like case management in Pega. For the case management applications, so it's really fast to develop and it can scale and be extended based upon the business requirements.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. 

The documentation and training available are great.

Pega is coming out with Pega Express, which is kind of a low-code development platform. The business rules can be built in a Pega Express Portal, which is more specifically built for business users and not technical users. That way, even non-technical people are able to build their own business processes easily.

The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed.  

With Camunda, containerization is the most helpful feature. It can containerize and it can have its own deployment process. Pega may be adding that feature in a future release, however, right now, that's lacking and needs to be addressed.

I'd like to see Pega support microservices architecture, which it doesn't do right now.

We have been using the solution for more than six years.

The scalability is excellent. It can scale as much as you need it to. It's one of the great aspects of the product.

I've never directly contacted technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. We have our own internal team that can troubleshoot.  

That said, we used to connect with Pega on issues and it's my understanding that support tickets can be addressed very quickly. Support-wise it's very extensive. 

I also trained in Appian. 

The initial setup is straightforward. There is no complexity. There is documentation around the installation process and upgrade process as well. Pega will also provide you with good training materials in the Pega Express Portal, which is helpful for teams who are planning for new developments. That way, they can learn easily and understand everything.

It's a great product, Pega, however, cost-wise, it is a little expensive compared to other BPM tools. That's where I feel that they can improve.

Now, we are exploring other software, like Camunda. We just want to see the different designs or decide which tool is better for our application.

We are a customer and an end-user.

We have been using Pega for more than six years, and at this point, we also want to just explore the other BPM tools. It's kind of for considering cost efficiency also. We are looking at the cost of the development effort or the scalability of the tool. While I like Pega, I'm just exploring the other BPM tools with respect to Pega.

While it depends on the application you are using, if you're planning for an enterprise application that can interact with different applications, Pega would be a good option.

Sometimes if you have a smaller workflow, for example, if you're just introducing a smaller workflow in an existing application and you just want to leverage only that workflow-related feature, you don't need Pega. You can just have any workflow tool, like Camunda or Appian. Cost-wise, Pega may cost you more.

If you're planning to leverage all the features in Pega, like case management and low-code, no-code and RPA, robotic process automation, and other high level or case management, if you are planning to leverage all these different kinds of features that are available in Pega, just go with Pega. And if you're just planning to leverage only a kind of workflow, you don't need to go with Pega. You can just go with other BP flows or BPM process models like Camunda. 

There are a lot of features that you can explore in fault tolerance and error handling, exception handling, et cetera. There are other items as well if you're in the development stage, and something like Page will likely be helpful. I don't know of other tools that will support anything to that extent.

There are still some limitations in the solution. I'd rate it at an eight out of ten, as there are still some improvements that can be made. 

Regarding the primary use cases of Pega BPM, I can say that my company deals with multiple domains, like the government sector, banking, financial institutions, telecom, health care, and multiple domains that require Pega BPM.

The most valuable feature of the solution, I believe, is case management, which sets it apart from the rest of the solutions in the market.

I believe that Pega's strategy when it comes to the UX part is not that great currently as compared to the other emerging BPM tools in the market. I look forward to seeing the UX part of the solution improved in a much better manner.

I have been using Pega BPM for nine and a half years. My company's customers use the solution. My company has a partnership with Pega.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

The solution's technical support is good. My company is able to acquire the required assistance from the solution's technical support team, and they also provide consultancy services. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I wouldn't say that I have used any other solutions previously, but I was trained to use TIBCO, a low-code platform.

The initial setup of Pega BPM is neither easy nor complex, so it falls somewhere in the middle. Pega has provided options for automation for the setup phase, but still, its setup phase is not as direct as some of the other tools in the market.

Pega BPM has set a path for its setup phase, wherein you need to go ahead with Helm chart automation since Pega is a very wide solution, and infrastructures can differ for different companies. Pega doesn't offer something specific, like Terraform. In other technologies, the product gets installed with one click or just a few clicks, but with Pega, a person has to work a lot on the infrastructure part as well.

The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises. My company provides the solution on Pega Cloud, technology-specific clouds, client-specific clouds, or on-premises.

The complete implementation process for Pega BPM would take a minimum of two to three days, prioritizing the infrastructure first and then the product.

Two people, one from the infrastructure end and one from the product end, which is the technical support person from Pega, would be needed to complete the deployment of the product. There is also the need to have Pega's partner who does the installation, making him or her the third person involved in the deployment.

The price of Pega BPM falls on the higher side of the spectrum if I were to compare it with other solutions in the market. What sets Pega BPM apart from other solutions in the market is that it has many features, including the use of AI and modern gen AI, which currently is not something you can experience in any other tools in the market. The aforementioned details contribute to making Pega BPM a leader in the market.

I would say the people who have realistic business process management kinds of use cases can go ahead and purchase Pega BPM blindfolded since it serves as a great case management tool, better than any other tool in the market. Pega BPM provides great visibility to its users, especially when you are involved in designing, where it will show you the number of stages, steps, processes, data, and even the people or parties who were involved, making it a great tool for case management. Presently, Pega BPM is heading towards the inclusion of more AI, owing to which it can be considered as one of the leaders in the market. The CRM part of the solution is one of its key selling features.

Though the solution's UX is good for developers, when you have to deliver the product to the customer, you don't get too many options for customization that can help you create an appealing view.

I rate the overall solution an eight and a half to nine out of ten.

The solution can be used to quickly manage and monitor processes in your organization. 

I have found the solution to be flexible and they provide good support. 

In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well. 

The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The solution is stable.

We have a customer that has over 6,000 users using the solution.

The solution provides very good support. They have the experience, knowledge, and are always helpful. 

I have used previously used Camunda, jBPM, and IBM solutions.

The version for private use on your workstation is easy to install. However, if you want to prepare a platform, it is not easy. All good solutions are not easy to install and tend to be complex and because of this, I would not say this solution is any more complex than any other good solution.

The amount of technical team needed depends on the project. For small implementations, we use one to two people and for big projects, we can have over 30 developers.

The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair.

This solution is one of the best tools on the market right now. I would recommend it to others.

I rate Pega BPM a ten out of ten.

We are using Pega BPM for all the major domains, insurance, banking, FMCG, and telecom.

The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development.

Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful.

I have been using Pega BPM for approximately four years.

I rate the stability of Pega BPM a nine out of ten.

We have approximately 2,000 users using this solution.

I rate the scalability of Pega BPM a nine out of ten.

I have contacted the support from Pega BPM.

I rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

Positive

I have previously used OutSystems.

Both OutSystems and Pega BPM are Java-based applications with similar implementation methods. However, Pega BPM has a more integrated digital transformation solution and includes tools for RPA, while OutSystems does not have a specific focus on RPA. Pega BPM has more solutions geared toward digital transformations.

The initial setup of Pega BPM can be complex if the implementer does not have Java knowledge.

The price of Pega BPM is in the middle range compared to other solutions.

I rate the price of Pega BPM a five out of ten.

We have 30 people for the maintenance of the solution.

I rate Pega BPM n eight out of ten.

I am currently using it in my current organization. I have recently joined a new organization that also uses Pega, but in my previous organization, we used Pega for a couple of use cases where we set up automated workflows and other things.

We were doing straight-through processing and had everything set up. And we had RPA, and BluePrism bots there that we wanted to decommission, we set up Pega to do so.

We had issues with RP as a technology, as well as numerous challenges with some critical processes. Now, what used to always fail, too many bots and too many handoffs, both human and automated, is where we thought we would build APIs and integrate Pega.

When we were implementing in 2012, we also used Pega phones. It was a complete front office to back office interaction that was created, followed by case management. But I'm not sure, if you say case management as a feature, there's also knowledge management, which is present, but case management is what I've used extensively. 

Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable.

If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example.

It currently has OpenSpan, but OpenSpan is a different thing entirely, as you call it in robotics order. 

If the BPM and robotics could be integrated more easily, then I believe both could be used.

It is not at all integrated. OpenSpan operates in a completely different manner, and Pega operates in a completely different manner. Part of it is called Pega robotics, but it has nothing in common, in my opinion.

I have used Pega BPM for quite some time. I started using Pega BPM in 2012, it has been for 10 years.

However, because I was leading at the time, I didn't have much experience with the tool. There was one client at the time, where my role was to lead a 60-person team. 

We actually did massive implementations. We used that finance framework to create a lot of workflows, at least three to four workflow applications that were quite large, as well as a lot of integrations and such. 

We did use it extensively from 2012 to 2015. We are still using it.

Pega BPM is definitely a stable product.

Pega BPM is scalable.

I am not sure how well it will work because we have a lot of requirements that I see today, we have a lot of emails, that we want to set up, all of these as workflow. I am still trying to understand and see how all of these emails will be converted to case management and email listeners, how much it can be scaled, and whether it'll work properly or not when the volumes increase because we have a huge demand right now. We also have to see how Pega will support us.

We haven't reached the point where we can scale to maximum capacity to see how the product performs. However, we can currently see that the product is scaling based on our requirements.

Because I am new to the organization I don't know how many users it has. But, in the previous organization, I believe there were many business units that used it, including the front of house and back of house. I wouldn't have a figure in mind.

At my previous company, I was one of the business units that used it. I wouldn't know, but from my business unit's perspective, the front of house was probably 200 people.

It is used daily, and we get through our smart forms, we get the inputs, and then the back office creates the interaction, and the back office works on it.

They have a very good support system.  You must have your contacts in place, and they must respond to you based on the escalated level. It's fairly consistent.

I would rate the technical support a four out of five.

Positive

So far, I have primarily used Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere for RPA.

The initial setup was difficult because, as previously stated, there were numerous integrations. However, we had excellent support from the ECS team, the Pega team, and the platform setup. 

Once we got it set up, I would say we were pretty stable. Once done correctly and set up properly, it should be more stable than an RPA solution, in my opinion.

I would rate the initial setup a four out of five.

The initial setup was done in-house.

It was in-house when I did my setup. It was not a cloud setup, but rather an in-house setup. We did an upgrade, and everything was done in-house.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

Pega BPM is used by us for customer onboarding, support, and care.

Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities. 

By creating a visual layout of the business process, designers can easily go and implement the business process. And from there, you can pretty much do it in concur. You can concentrate on each area of the business process and create user input tasks with defined role-based access controls on each of those user input tasks.

Pega's low code development is entirely based on object-oriented and application development. However, I believe it can be used in a low code application, such as development platform features such as tracking and dropping some user components. It has that support, but not to the extent that other platforms do, such as the app in or out system. They make it very simple to create UIs without the need to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript together to create pixel-perfect UIs. I believe Pega could improve in this area.

I have been working with Pega BPM for more than five years.

It's fairly stable and in performance as well.

We didn't have to put much effort into upgrading our platform and adding more resources. I would say that the platform is obviously very robust and capable of scaling to large enterprise-scale recommendations.

In our company, we have more than 300 people who use this solution.

Technical support is very good. They usually respond quickly to inquiries, whether they are about infrastructure or products.

The initial setup is straightforward. You can now create your business processes and begin designing forms for end users. On Cloud, it is pretty straightforward.

Maintenance is dependent on the size of the program or application. You would need at least two people. However, the number of people would vary depending on the size of the application and the program.

Some of the key pain points were addressed by the applications that were developed, primarily in terms of user satisfaction and implementing them in the business process. 

The return on investment was not a consumer web application where the product would be rolled out to the general public and revenue would be generated. 

It was designed primarily for internal business users, With the main goal of the application being to improve business processes and bring all offline processes online to have a digital footprint of those business processes, making tracking easier.

I am not aware of the cost. But, considering the licenses, user licenses, and infrastructure, I'd guess around a million USD.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market. For the learning curve, I would reduce two points.