We performed a comparison between OpenShift, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, and Rackspace Cloud [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."The security features of OpenShift are strong when in use of role-based access."
"The initial setup is simple, and OpenShift is open-source, so it's easy to install on any cloud platform."
"The most valuable feature is the high availability for the applications."
"We have found the cluster management function to be very good with this product."
"We want to build a solution that can be deployable to any cloud because of client requirements and OpenShift allows us to do this."
"Overall, the solution's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is excellent."
"Valuable features include auto-recreate of pod if pod fails; fast rollback, with one click, to previous version."
"It is a stable platform."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"Image backup is a valuable feature. Even though this is a common feature, it is very helpful for us."
"There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services."
"The most valuable feature for us is the support, which is really efficient."
"I want easier node management and more user-friendly scripts for installing master and worker nodes."
"If we can have a GUI-based configuration with better flexibility then it will be great."
"There is no orchestration platform in OpenShift."
"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."
"It could use auto-scaling based on criteria such as transaction volume, queue backlog, etc. Currently, it is limited to CPU and memory."
"OpenShift could improve by providing the ability to integrate with public cloud platforms. This way we can easily use the services that these platforms offer. For instance, Amazon AWS. However, all the three major hyper-scalers solutions offer excellent DevOps and CI/CD tooling. If there was an easy way to integrate with them it would be beneficial. We need a way to easily integrate with the monitoring and dashboard services that they provide."
"An enhancement to consider for the future might involve incorporating a comprehensive solution for CI/CD tailored specifically for OpenShift."
"Needs work on volume handling (although this is already better with GlusterFS). Security (SSSD) would also be an improvement."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"It would be nice to have more built-in suites compared to others. It would enable easier integration."
"It doesn't offer Elastic IP like AWS. And also we can't configure our server based on region."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points