We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL], IBM eDiscovery Manager, and OpenText EnCase eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."
"Creating and running queries on the solution is very good."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The solution is very stable."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"There were minor UI bugs."
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
