The scalability is very good. The tool automatically scales up. It’s a relatively simple setup.

The solution's scalability is good. 

The solution is scalable.

I rate Amazon RDS an eight out of ten for scalability.

My impression is that Amazon RDS is quite a scalable solution. If there are any issues, it's usually on the application side of things.

MySQL RDS can scale very well. I have been using it in critical Production services.

Since it is a SaaS-based application, about 30 to 40 developers are working with Amazon RDS.

We never faced any issues with the solution's scalability. Hundreds to millions of users are using the solution, and we have plans to increase the usage.

I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten. It is really, really scalable.

Amazon RDS has been used for major applications, and multiple people work on the applications. So, around 600 people are using RDS to work on applications.

The solution's scalability depends on the application. There are no fixed users. I plan to increase the usage of the solution. 

It is definitely a scalable solution, but we have not scaled up to the maximum since we have not faced any problems yet, considering we operate well within the threshold, which makes the product good for us.

My entire team consisting of around fifty people uses the solution.

It's supposed to be scalable, but we don't feel that. True, there won't be any drops. The solution they gave was to maintain our cluster at a level sufficient for our peak load. However, that will probably defeat the whole purpose of on-demand scalability. So that is certainly where we might need to rethink.

Amazon RDS is highly scalable. It is much simpler to scale up compared to an on-premise solution where you need to buy new hardware and migrate all the data. Ifwe need more capacity, there is a symbol that you can click on to upgrade your hardware. 

If you want one more server in a different region, you can spin it up and everything is done on the cloud. You can just select what you need and go, whether you're going to downgrade or upgrade to system type TX for whatever configuration you want.

Around 4,000 people in my company use the product.

I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. Multiple teams in our organization are using the solution.

The product's scalability is good. It is used by over 1000 users in my company. 

Around 100 people are using Amazon RDS in our organization.

I rate Amazon RDS an eight out of ten for scalability.

Scalability is one of the solution's best features.

We haven't reached the point where we need to scale up for performance or storage. But I don't think manually scaling the discs is easy to do, so it should be able to scale on its own. In addition, the instances can manage the traffic, and there's an option for setting each total scale. So depending on how production goes, we may scale it. We have three people using the solution, including myself. So we need only one person to maintain.

We are just now experimenting with scalability.

We have two engineers using this solution in our organization.

We haven't expanded on the solution, so I'm unsure about if it would scale well or not. We have a bunch of teams using the solution in the company, but they're small.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We do not have plans to increase the usage of the solution.

I plan to increase the usage of this solution.

I rate the scalability of Amazon RDS a five out of ten.

Scalability is an issue. It doesn't handle large data sets well, so we use a different solution for those. This is a limitation of RDBMs, and data doubles every two years. 

I rate the scalability of Amazon RDS a six out of ten.

It is scalable. We have more than 12,000 users who are using this solution.

I've found the solution to be scalable. 

I have worked with only three clients at the moment with RDS.

Scalability is one of Amazon RDS's strongest points. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Amazon RDS is a scalable solution.

RDS is a single instance. However, the actual users are approximately 500 people, both direct and indirect.

We have stopped using it.

Amazon Web Services is built for scalability. RDS is designed with scalability in mind.

The scalability of Amazon RDS is very good.

We have between 5,000 and 6,000 users.

The solution is fully scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with ease.

Everyone in our organization uses the product. It's pretty widespread. The idea is you save your data on Cloud and make it available to everybody, add it to your website.

We plan to continue to use this service, at least over the next year or so.

I don't think it's very scalable. In comparison, Microsoft Azure has many options. In RDS, I couldn't even find many options to increase or to perform a scale up or scale down.

This had the same scalability issues as Oracle databases on premise.

We have around ten users of this solution. We plan to keep using this solution.