AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Other Advice
EG
Eric Goldenberg
AWS Solution Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We are using an older version from before AWS bought it.
This is a good product. I'd rate it nine out of ten.
View full review »FH
reviewer2248701
Systems Administrator at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees
The solution's replication was fine. We faced issues when we actually tried to utilize it. Every time we made a big change to any of the on-premise servers that were being replicated, we'd always have to change our replication engines, sizing, and the disc it's written on. Otherwise, it would end up taking around 30 days for a small monthly Windows update to replicate.
I would not recommend CloudEndure Disaster Recovery to other users because of all the issues we had with the wrong sizing and the fact that there are better solutions in the market.
Overall, I rate the solution a two out of ten.
RK
Ramam Kallakuri
Lead DBA at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Zerto, Veeam Software and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Before implementing CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, my advice to others is to thoroughly read the documentation. We made some mistakes during our initial implementation, which caused problems and incurred additional costs. We attempted to failover a few servers just to test the solution but later realized that we couldn't simply delete them and resync from on-premises. We had to perform a full rollback, which we were not prepared to do at the time. As a result, we were unable to stop the server running on AWS and had to delete it entirely, causing us to start the synchronization process from scratch. This was a significant issue, especially since the server was a large five-terabyte space server. By carefully reading the documentation, you can avoid making such mistakes.
I rate CloudEndure Disaster Recovery an eight out of ten.
View full review »I was able to build this up real quick and testing has always been successful as well. I have had issues bringing data back to the facility, but the restore has always worked with CloudEndure.
Before you jump into it, test it and be aware of the bandwidth. We did have to put in a dedicated AWS direct line for our building. Make sure if you are going to put something in place like this that you have the proper bandwidth. The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line.
View full review »RM
GlobalIn47b7
Global Insurance Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Planning ahead is important, just making sure you really understand what you need before finalizing the solution.
View full review »EW
SharePoi2b31
SharePoint Lead
Follow the write-up. It is very good.
View full review »We tried native solutions before, and once we migrate to AWS, we'll try their native solution as well, but we'll still need CloudEndure to replicate between our data centers.
View full review »MB
Manjunathachar Br
Cloud Consultant at sonata information Technology Limited
I rate CloudEndure Disaster Recovery an eight out of ten.
View full review »JD
reviewer1267797
Technology Manager with 1-10 employees
I would rate this solution a five out of ten.
I would recommend this product for cloud-based solutions. I can't recommend it for Azure.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Zerto, Veeam Software and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.