Compare ActiveMQ vs. IBM MQ

ActiveMQ is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software while IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews. ActiveMQ is rated 0, while IBM MQ is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Helps integrate between applications, reduce rework, by reusing existing components". ActiveMQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and Apache Kafka, whereas IBM MQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and Apache Kafka.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ActiveMQ Logo
32,204 views|28,628 comparisons
IBM MQ Logo
33,081 views|24,567 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use ActiveMQ? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2019.
373,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
To implement such an IBM solution, a company has to pay a lot in term of licensing and consultancy. A pricing model might be a better option.In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side.IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly.99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best.Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run.I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
373,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Miriam Tover
Winster JoseReal User

ActiveMQ offers very high throughput and low latency compared to IBM MQ.
ActiveMQ supports standard messaging protocols like AMQP, STOMP, MQTT etc whereas IBM MQ just comply with JMS and its own protocol. IBM MQ Light supports AMQP though.
IBM MQ is much preferred in enterprise environment, probably due to the support. Redhat AMQ offers enterprise support on ActiveMQ.
AFAIK documentation wise, they are at par.
Both support clustering. But only in ActiveMQ real storage of messages in another broker which is less loaded happens. IBM MQ just enables communication between Queue managers.
But I would prefer to put a few more options on the table.
1. RabbitMQ - fully compliant with protocols, supports replication and distribution of messages, throughput in tens of thousands
2. Redis - Light weight single threaded server. Supports pub sub messaging and supports HA via sentinel and clustering for distributed messaging
3. Kafka - Preferred mechanism for data streaming. Throughput in millions.
4. ZeroMQ - Brokerless messaging platform. Very high throughput.
5. NanoMsg - Brokerless. Claims to be advanced than ZeroMQ

13 February 19
Jack AngoeReal User

From my Experience so far i will go for RabbitMQ its rock solid and robust with a simple learning curve. Its free and has great documentation available

12 February 19
Ranking
Views
32,204
Comparisons
28,628
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
33,081
Comparisons
24,567
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
227
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Also Known As
AMQWebSphere MQ
Learn
Apache
IBM
Overview

Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

Offer
Learn more about ActiveMQ
Learn more about IBM MQ
Sample Customers
University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company10%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer14%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise88%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise81%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2019.
373,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email