Compare IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ

IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 31 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. IBM MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "We don't lose messages in transit and we can store messages and forward them when required". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "One crucial feature was guaranteed messaging. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version". IBM MQ is most compared with VMware RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, IBM MQ and Apache Kafka. See our IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM MQ Logo
33,972 views|25,504 comparisons
VMware RabbitMQ Logo
37,422 views|29,017 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the stability. It's perfect in this way.The most valuable feature is the Queue Manager, which lies in the middle between our application and our core banking server.IBM MQ deals mainly with the queuing mechanism. It passes the data and it publishes it. These two abilities are the most valuable features.It also has a backup queue concept and topics, features that I have not seen anywhere else. I like these features very much.Secure, safe, and very fast.I like the architecture it provides seamlessly for assured delivery.The clusterization which results in persistence is the most valuable feature.The reliability of the queuing is the most valuable feature.

Read more »

The security is great.The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network.We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell.

Read more »

Cons
In the next release, I would like for there to be easier monitoring. The UI should be easier for non-technical users to set up appliances and servers.The memory management is very poor and it consumes too much memory.It is expensive. The cost is high. There should be more improvement in the new age of technologies.It could provide more monitoring tools and some improvement to the UI. I would also like to see more throughput in future versions.I wanted to upgrade Windows Server. It's not that easy to move.They have provided a Liberty Profile in the Web Console for administration, and that could be further enhanced. It is not fit for use by an enterprise. They have to get rid of their WebSphere process and develop a front-end on Node.js or the like.The initial setup is difficult. Creating your own cluster is difficult. Working with cluster repositories is difficult. Issue management with IBM MQ is difficult.I can't say pricing is good.

Read more »

Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster.I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting.RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
IBM MQ is expensive and they charge based on the CPU.It's a very expensive product.It would be a 10 out of 10 if it wasn't so expensive.It is a very expensive product compared to the open source products in the market.Most of our customers are quite happy with the solution but they have an issue with the cost. They want to move to cheaper solutions.IBM products, in general, have high licensing costs and support costs are too high.There is a different platform price between Windows, z/OS, and iSeries.Our costs haven't increased but they also have not improved.

Read more »

This is an open source solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Miriam Tover
author avatarfjb_saper
Real User

The biggest difference is the number of platforms supported. I have never heard of RabbitMQ running on ZOS (mind you ZOS and not z/Linux).
The same way I don't know that the AS400 platform would support RabbitMQ. Also, I don't think RabbitMQ has the same ease of use and set up that IBM MQ has.

Next thing to consider is support. Think about how long it will take to get support for RabbitMQ and a Fix vs the time to get support from IBM. Finally and not the least, you will also want to compare the features (like assured delivery).

Ranking
Views
33,972
Comparisons
25,504
Reviews
29
Average Words per Review
459
Avg. Rating
8.4
Views
37,422
Comparisons
29,017
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
381
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere MQRabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
Learn
IBM
VMware
Overview

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

  • RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.
Offer
Learn more about IBM MQ
Learn more about VMware RabbitMQ
Sample Customers
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Insurance Company13%
Retailer12%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company39%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company7%
REVIEWERS
University18%
Software R&D Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Security Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider16%
Insurance Company6%
Media Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise86%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
REVIEWERS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.