Compare IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM MQ Logo
27,201 views|19,969 comparisons
VMware RabbitMQ Logo
23,800 views|18,123 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
502,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features are the point to point messaging and the MQ API.""The high availability and session recovery are the most valuable features because we need the solution live all day.""It is stable, reliable, and scalable.""Whenever payments are happening, such as incoming payments to the bank, we need to notify the customer. With MQ we can actually do that asynchronously. We don't want to notify the customer for each and every payment but, rather, more like once a day. That kind of thing can be enabled with the help of MQ.""It's highly scalable. It provides various ways to establish high availability and workloads. E.g., you can spread workloads inside of your clusters.""IBM MQ is the right choice because of the stability and the performance. And from the support perspective, it's enough to have a really small team.""The MQ protocol is widely used across multiple applications and it's so simple for connectivity.""What is quite useful is the asynchronous function which means we don't lose everything in the bank. Although we use a lot of things synchronously, asynch is the best thing so that no banking information is ever lost, even when the network goes down and comes up."

More IBM MQ Pros »

"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network.""The security is great.""The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable.""Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see faster monitoring tools for this solution.""If they could come up with monitoring dashboards that would be good. We are using external monitoring tools, apart from our IBM MQ, to monitor IBM MQ. If we could get monitoring tools or dashboards to keep everything simple for the user to understand, that would be good.""I would like to see it integrate with the newer ways of messaging, such as Kafka. They might say that you have IBM Integration Bus to do that stuff, but it would be great if MQ could, out-of-the-box, listen to public Kafka.""They could integrate monitoring into the solution, a bit more than they do now. Currently, they have opened the REST API so you can get statistic and accounting information and details from MQ and build your own monitoring, if you want. IBM can improve the solution in this direction.""What could be improved is the high-availability. The way MQ works is that it separates the high-availability from the workload balance. The scalability should be easier. If something happens so that the messages are not available on each node, scalability is only possible for the workload balance.""The scalability is the one area where IBM has fallen behind. As much as it is used, there is a limit to the number of people who are skilled in MQ. That is definitely an issue. Places have kept their MQ-skilled people and other places have really struggled to get MQ skills. It's not a widely-known skillset.""In terms of volume, it is not able to handle a huge volume. We also have limitations of queues related to IBM MQ. We often need to handle a very big volume, but currently we do have limitations. If those kinds of limitations could be relaxed, it would help us to work better.""You should be able to increase the message size. It should be dynamic. Each queue has a limitation of 5,000."

More IBM MQ Cons »

"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting.""Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster.""When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use.""They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is high.""There is a different platform price between Windows, z/OS, and iSeries.""IBM products, in general, have high licensing costs and support costs are too high.""Most of our customers are quite happy with the solution but they have an issue with the cost. They want to move to cheaper solutions.""It is a very expensive product compared to the open source products in the market.""It would be a 10 out of 10 if it wasn't so expensive.""It's a very expensive product.""IBM MQ is expensive and they charge based on the CPU."

More IBM MQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
502,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ" solutions that have come into the market place. From my perspective, while each… more »
Top Answer: The solution is very stable.
Top Answer: This solution requires a license and we have purchased an enterprise license.
Top Answer: Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues.
Top Answer: We are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost.
Top Answer: RabbitMQ provides the ability to scale queues in a very simple and elegant way. If it had a “failure queue” with robust delivery and recovery built-in with the same power, that would be great. We use… more »
Ranking
Views
27,201
Comparisons
19,969
Reviews
32
Average Words per Review
537
Rating
8.2
Views
23,800
Comparisons
18,123
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere MQ
RabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
Learn More
Overview

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

  • RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.
Offer
Learn more about IBM MQ
Learn more about VMware RabbitMQ
Sample Customers
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer12%
Insurance Company11%
Transportation Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
University17%
Computer Software Company8%
Security Firm8%
Transportation Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise86%
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise42%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
502,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 34 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. IBM MQ is rated 8.2, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "We don't lose messages in transit and we can store messages and forward them when required". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Beneficial features, simple install, highly scalable, and simple "pub/sub" model". IBM MQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, PubSub+ Event Broker, Anypoint MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, PubSub+ Event Broker, Red Hat AMQ and Anypoint MQ. See our IBM MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.