Compare ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
ActiveMQ is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 13th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. ActiveMQ is rated 0, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 0. On the other hand, ActiveMQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and Apache Kafka, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ and IBM MQ.
Ranking  | |
Views 32,204 Comparisons 28,628 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 269 Comparisons 233 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
 Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2019. 372,622 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 51% of the time.  Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. | Compared 35% of the time. Compared 31% of the time. Compared 21% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| AMQ | |
Learn | |
| Apache | Red Hat |
Overview | |
Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server. Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License | To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT). Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud. |
Offer | |
Learn more about ActiveMQ | Learn more about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS |
Sample Customers | |
| University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. | E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings |
Top Industries | |
Software R&D Company27% Financial Services Firm13% Comms Service Provider10% Insurance Company10% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2019.
372,622 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also ActiveMQ Reviews, Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Reviews, and our list of Best Message Queue (MQ) Software Companies.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign In.