• Home
  • AeroFS vs. Google Cloud Storage

AeroFS vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AeroFS Logo

AeroFS

72 views|35 comparisons
Google Logo

Google Cloud Storage

Read 66 Google Cloud Storage reviews
1,858 views|1,264 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Storage
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AeroFS and Google Cloud Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AeroFS?
Tài Nguyễn Thành
A cloud storage tool providing Firestore and BigQuery
Google Cloud Storage is a top cloud product on the Google Cloud Platform.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "They know that the pricing is comparable with Azure, AWS, and those other solutions like Amazon are cheaper, but they are not as flexible."
  • "Better pricing would be helpful."
  • "Its price is fine."
  • "It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."
  • "The price could be cheaper."
  • "The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."

    • More Google Cloud Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?
    Top Answer:It is flexible and simple to use.
    Read all 42 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Stor...
    Top Answer:The pricing is nominal for us as we are a charitable organization. We pay a monthly subscription fee.
    Read all 24 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?
    Top Answer:The solution’s stability could be improved.
    Read all 42 answers   →
    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 48 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    35
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 48 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    1,858
    Comparisons
    1,264
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    AeroFS
    Google
    Overview

    AeroFS delivers highly secure, enterprise-class file sharing and synchronization solutions that enable enterprises to better control and secure their data and increase collaboration among users. Like Dropbox and other online file-sharing offerings, AeroFS allows users to simply drag and drop files into a folder to sync and share them with colleagues and external partners. Unlike those offerings, however, AeroFS is deployed on the enterprise’s own infrastructure, and so enterprise data always stays under company and IT control. Files are shared directly between users’ devices, and enterprise data never resides on AeroFS servers. 

    Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

    Sample Customers
    University Health Network (UHN)
    1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization63%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Comms Service Provider3%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise67%
    Large Enterprise22%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Storage
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AeroFS is ranked 23rd in Cloud Storage while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 3rd in Cloud Storage with 66 reviews. AeroFS is rated 0.0, while Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". AeroFS is most compared with , whereas Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Microsoft Azure File Storage.

    See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.