We performed a comparison between AgileCraft and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The linking of PI Objectives with different features was one of the cool things. It had features, epics, and stories out of the box."
"The tool's installation is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of TFS are bug reporting and its high performance."
"The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"TFS' most valuable feature is the triage process. It is a robust solution that is easy to use."
"This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile."
"We use TFS for forecast management."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"I like the Kanban board. It is very useful in terms of seeing who is working on what and what the current status of work is."
"It should just have the integration with Jira. We haven't looked at it since Atlassian bought the product."
"TFS's CI/CD, project pipelines, and management development could be improved."
"Microsoft should discontinue the use of SharePoint as I don’t really see any value add to TFS, document management features can be included in TFS web portal itself, if required!"
"The solution should have better dashboards."
"TFS and MTM have their own style of working and they are different from other tools like Jira or TestRail, which are simpler and easy to use."
"More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively."
"I'm looking for specific options that aren't currently available, such as active status, new status, or what's currently in progress."
"I would like to see TFS improve its web interface as there are some limitations with IDs and the integration behind it and with open-source tools like VS Code."
"I would also like a true command prompt like Git."
Earn 20 points
AgileCraft is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. AgileCraft is rated 7.0, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AgileCraft writes "Linking of PI Objectives with different features was cool, but it didn't have integration with Jira". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". AgileCraft is most compared with Jira, Jira Align, Rally Software and Broadcom Clarity , whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.