We performed a comparison between Agiloft Workflow and BPM and BIC Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's very safe. It has a high degree of security, much better than many other solutions I have researched."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"The product is easy to use."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"Agiloft does not have a good user interface."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
Earn 20 points
Agiloft Workflow and BPM is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) while BIC Platform is ranked 28th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. Agiloft Workflow and BPM is rated 9.0, while BIC Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Agiloft Workflow and BPM writes "Easy to use with a high degree of security and excellent flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". Agiloft Workflow and BPM is most compared with , whereas BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, Visio, Camunda and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.