We performed a comparison between Agiloft Workflow and BPM and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's very safe. It has a high degree of security, much better than many other solutions I have researched."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"The best feature is the automation."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"Agiloft does not have a good user interface."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
Earn 20 points
Agiloft Workflow and BPM is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. Agiloft Workflow and BPM is rated 9.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Agiloft Workflow and BPM writes "Easy to use with a high degree of security and excellent flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Agiloft Workflow and BPM is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
