We performed a comparison between Alteryx Designer and CloverDX Designer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."For my daily analytics needs, the entire Alteryx Designer platform is beneficial."
"When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis."
"Alteryx Designer's best features are that it's easy to use and performs well."
"The features I found most valuable are the preparation features – the Join and the Transform."
"The product is intuitive and easy to use."
"I like Alteryx Designer's drag-and-drop feature, where you drag a component, configure it and quickly run it."
"The functionality of drag and drop is the most valuable. It is a very user-friendly tool that can be understood easily. My teams also work with other solutions, such as Integration Services, and these solutions are very difficult for people who don't have technical knowledge."
"I believe in the ability to connect to multiple data sources, as well as the ease of use to transform data and output data in a variety of formats."
"Its simplicity and the way it handles graphs are the most valuable features."
"It would be simpler if they provided a component where you could simply enter some parameters and see the results."
"An improvement for Alteryx Designer would be faster bug fixes and updates."
"It is challenging to view the data using Alteryx Designer."
"If the price were reduced then it would be more competitive."
"Alteryx's data science and machine learning capabilities are where it loses out to DataIQ."
"Alteryx could move faster to create a cloud equivalent of the desktop version of Designer."
"The major concern in Alteryx Designer stems from the high costs attached to the product."
"When configuring the Logix, the UA could be improved."
"If I could give any advice to the guys who are developing it, I would suggest them to really look at the enterprise features, such as being able to log what's going on, being able to capture the current state of processing, and being able to recover from error situations. So, there should be a focus on logging, recoverability, and monitoring. We should be able to monitor what's going on, and in case of any issues, we should be able to recover and restart processing and other things. For scalability and performance, I would probably suggest the Pushdown feature so that you can do the transformation directly on the data source. You do not need to do that calculation within the ETL server. For this, you should be aware of the type of data because each database or kind of storage, such as Hadoop, has its own ANSI standard or language, such as SQL. Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM have their own language. Based on the feedback that I have got, its initial setup takes some time. It could perhaps be simpler."
Earn 20 points
Alteryx Designer is ranked 9th in Data Integration with 27 reviews while CloverDX Designer is ranked 66th in Data Integration. Alteryx Designer is rated 8.0, while CloverDX Designer is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloverDX Designer writes "Simple, stable, and allows us to handle data from various sources, but needs enterprise features for logging, recoverability, and monitoring". Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, FME, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Palantir Foundry, whereas CloverDX Designer is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
