Compare Amazon API Gateway vs. webMethods.io API

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon API Gateway Logo
11,317 views|9,909 comparisons
webMethods.io API Logo
1,355 views|1,081 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use webMethods.io API? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Seeburger and others in API Management. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is a pay-per-use service, where you only pay for what you use."

More Amazon API Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
out of 39 in API Management
Views
11,317
Comparisons
9,909
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
461
Rating
7.6
21st
out of 39 in API Management
Views
1,355
Comparisons
1,081
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
webMethods API Management, webMethods API Cloud
Learn
Amazon
Software AG
Overview

Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create an API that acts as a "front door" for applications to access data, business logic, or functionality from your back-end services, such as workloads running on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), code running on AWS Lambda, or any Web application.

If you’re joining the API economy, you need an API management platform that brings it all together for you. API management powered by webMethods is a complete and end-to-end platform, covering design, development, deployment, security, publishing and monitoring of your APIs and services. Use it to unlock the business value of unique data and services, and take advantage of mobile first, open API, hybrid integration, Internet of Things (IoT) and service governance initiatives. Reach new customers and partners, find new sources of revenue and leverage your development community. Now available in the cloud!

Offer
Learn more about Amazon API Gateway
Learn more about webMethods.io API
Sample Customers
Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, VeracodeClal
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company12%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Seeburger and others in API Management. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Amazon API Gateway is ranked 7th in API Management with 7 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 21st in API Management. Amazon API Gateway is rated 7.6, while webMethods.io API is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "A scalable solution with End-to-end protection for your service, and ties in well with the AWS ecosystem". On the other hand, Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Layer7 API Management, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee, CentraSite, Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager, Layer7 API Management and Microsoft Azure API Management.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.