We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"The solution is very stable. It's run for years without the need to do anything except, add new patches when they are available, which are always a good idea to install."
"The ability to write my own parsers for the devices that are not supported by Fortinet is the most valuable feature."
"It's a very nice solution to work with."
"The primary valuable feature is that it has replaced a whole lot of other products with one platform."
"The interface is very easy to use. The connector in the core has FortiSIEM support from the vendor."
"The advanced agents used to collect logs have been most valuable. We have also made use of the advanced intelligence this solution offers."
"Analytics. It can provide log information from the device. With log information, I can see if there is a threat"
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"We expect the latest patch from Fortinet FortiSIEM to give the ability to work with signature files."
"They could work on their documentation. If there's anything about the solution that needs improvement, it's that. For example, documentation already is on a very high level but specifically on the CLI there are tons of features which can be fine-tuned and thousands of commands are very difficult to document. If they could make this easier, it would improve the overall solution."
"Does not have load-sharing or high-availability, and these are important things to implement. I can do the same things in another way, but not naturally having these features makes it complicated."
"Our customers are noticing configuration available in the GUI interface and I think that they should be equal."
"The graphs on the user interface could be improved as we often experience glitches."
"I would like to see easier implementation in the future."
"The product does not have Security Orchestration and Automation Response, I would recommend adding this feature."
"The interface needs some improvements because it's a bit cumbersome when you're trying to view items. It takes some time to get used to. Additionally, sometimes the scrolling does not work."
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 5th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 8th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 63 reviews. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), ThreatQ, Splunk Enterprise Security and Group-IB Threat Intelligence, whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, LogRhythm SIEM and Wazuh.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.