We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Apache Airflow vs. Nintex Workflow

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Platform Logo
38,519 views|25,491 comparisons
Apache Airflow Logo
15,590 views|10,299 comparisons
Nintex Workflow Logo
3,491 views|2,486 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""It has an open BPM""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""The best feature is the automation.""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow.""The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions.""The initial setup was straightforward and it does not take long to complete.""We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution.""The best part of Airflow is its direct support for Python, especially because Python is so important for data science, engineering, and design. This makes the programmatic aspect of our work easy for us, and it means we can automate a lot.""I like the UI rework, it's much easier.""I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."

More Apache Airflow Pros »

"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability.""It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well.""The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

More Nintex Workflow Pros »

Cons
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Lacking in forms visualization.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.""The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform.""The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex.""Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"One specific feature that is missing from Airflow is that the steps of your workflow are not pipelined, meaning the stageless steps of any workflow. Not every workflow can be implemented within Airflow.""The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not.""Technical support is an area that needs improvement.""The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved.""We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult.""I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases.""UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."

More Apache Airflow Cons »

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool.""The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper.""We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems.""The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

More Nintex Workflow Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive.""When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition.""There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing for the product is reasonable.""Although Airflow is open source software, there's also commercial support for it by Astronomer. We personally don't use the commercial support, but it's always an option if you don't mind the extra cost.""We are using the open-source version of Apache Airflow."

More Apache Airflow Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Comparatively, it's expensive.""We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year.""The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

More Nintex Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In a broad perspective when you compare Camunda & Bonita they have the below features: Camunda features: BPM… more »
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: Apache Airflow is a great orchestration and automation tool. Its connectivity with other systems is a great plus point… more »
Top Answer: We are using the open-source version of Apache Airflow.
Top Answer: I am using a Celery Executor and I find that it crashes and I can't see any logs. I can only assume that it's a memory… more »
Top Answer: The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients… more »
Top Answer: The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
Airflow
Nintex Workflow Platform
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

Airflow is a platform to programmatically author, schedule and monitor workflows.

Use airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command line utilities make performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress, and troubleshoot issues when needed.

When workflows are defined as code, they become more maintainable, versionable, testable, and collaborative.

At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Apache Airflow
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Agari, WePay, Astronomer
Asiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company12%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise25%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise56%
Large Enterprise34%
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise60%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Airflow is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while Nintex Workflow is ranked 16th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 7.8, while Nintex Workflow is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Helps us maintain a clear separation of our functional logic from our operational logic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Good support, straightforward to set up, and improves our process performance". Apache Airflow is most compared with Amazon Step Functions, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Informatica Cloud Api and App Integration, whereas Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, Pega BPM, Bizagi, ARIS BPA and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Apache Airflow vs. Nintex Workflow report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.