We performed a comparison between Apigee and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is one of the earliest API management products and is good. It reduces the Time To Market aspects of products."
"Apigee is a very lightweight solution."
"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."
"The most valuable features are low-code play, quick packaging, and production."
"We use it to build API proxies for securing targeted back-ends with an emphasis on Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD)."
"A simple platform that's easier to work with than IBM API Connect. Support for it is really good and gives it advantage over other providers."
"It is easy to deploy, configure, and monitor the APA."
"The most valuable feature of the current version of Apigee, such as Apigee Edge, is that the maintenance and scalability of the service are not our responsibility. As a SaaS platform, Google takes care of it, ensuring the system is stable. Another valuable feature is the ability to customize the platform extensively. We can add JavaScript functionality to cater to any use case that is not available out of the box."
"The performance is good."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"The account simplification process can be improved."
"We've encountered challenges in leveraging Connect functionality, prompting us to explore additional tools, such as Fergus, to address implementation and security issues."
"The initial setup is not straightforward, particularly for hybrid solutions."
"It is an expensive solution."
"More documentation on the Open Banking Standard will help."
"Access restrictions can be improved."
"I would like to see the monitoring, dashboards, and reports improve."
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our Apigee vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.