We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"It is one of the best products available in the market."
"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."
"The solution provides information about the risk factors."
"The playbook engine is flexible and allows for the graphical visualization of processes, enabling the implementation of dynamic playbooks for incident response or testing."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics has easy architecture, has a good portfolio and integration."
"The solution can scale."
"We find predictive analysis capabilities valuable."
"The tool helps with infrastructure, application, and network monitoring."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is a pretty solid product for the type that it is representing. It is a CM solution as compared to Splunk or ArcSight from HP. It is also user friendly. It comes with some internal AI as well, in which it automatically maps multiple lots from unrelated devices and makes a smart decision to link them back and create an offense based on that. It is a smart tool."
"A nice benefit is when we go to the process of selecting our youth cases, they go by building blocks. QRadar links it to building blocks."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"The user interface and configurability of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics can be improved. It has a lot of pre-configured settings and not many things can be changed. It also needs more integrations. Currently, User Behavior Analytics is integrated only with IBM QRadar. It could have deeper integrations. It can also have more complicated scoring models. Currently, it has a very simple linear scoring model for users."
"The solution should include remote action capabilities."
"For the common needs of clients to fulfill requirements, a real integration with Blueworks Live (BPA modeling tool also from IBM) and a more suitable BPM on cloud solution for midsize customers."
"QVM is another instance where they need to revise the vulnerability scoring and the proper remediation details."
"The tech support is not that good."
"IBM Security QRadar’s GUI could be improved."
"There are areas in IBM Security QRadar that could benefit from improvement. Its ability to customize knowledge for specific purposes could be enhanced. Also, it lacks clarity in presenting details. It is also difficult to see the reports."
"Right now, if you look at the compatibility, if you need to deploy QRadar in a physical appliance you have only two choices of server, their own or a Lenovo server. In today's world, you cannot keep something tied to such a big brand. Clients want to be able to use whatever type of server they want."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 29th in Log Management with 30 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and VMware Aria Operations for Logs, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Securonix Next-Gen SIEM. See our ArcSight Logger vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.