Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 9 Devo reviews.
9,912 views|3,980 comparisons
ArcSight Logger Logo
2,517 views|1,904 comparisons
Wazuh Logo
Read 1 Wazuh review.
2,178 views|1,618 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.""Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.""The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events.""The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events.""The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.""One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful.""The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way.""The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."

More Devo Pros »

"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable.""It's an efficient solution.""In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer.""It's a robust, mature product and you can do some really complex operations and analytics.""The most valuable feature is the search capability, which is simple to use.""ArcSight provides the basic information that we want.""Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query.""It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."

More ArcSight Logger Pros »

"The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable."

More Wazuh Pros »

Cons
"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.""There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.""There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. The breadth of overall log parsers that exists right now is an area that they could improve. Natively, there's more that could be done by Devo then what it can and can't understand from a parsing perspective.""Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs.""The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.""There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space.""Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution.""Technical support could be better."

More Devo Cons »

"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence.""The console in older versions is not user-friendly.""I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory.""You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose.""We have had problems with archiving.""The integration with other systems could be improved.""The solution could be improved in maintenance settings.""It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."

More ArcSight Logger Cons »

"Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs."

More Wazuh Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""We have seen ROI. We have seen cost savings in maintenance, upkeep, and support.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.""Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs.""[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is quite harsh.""It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

More ArcSight Logger Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's very, very versatile.
Top Answer: Devo, like other vendors, doesn't charge extra for playbooks and automation. That way, you are only paying for the side… more »
Top Answer: I need more empowerment in reporting. For example, when I'm using Qlik or Power BI in terms of reporting for the… more »
Top Answer: It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the… more »
Top Answer: It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now.
Top Answer: It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in… more »
Top Answer: The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable.
Top Answer: Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs.
Top Answer: We collect logs in it, and then we correlate logs against the MITRE ATT&CK framework. We have configured some… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger
Learn More
Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.

Wazuh is an IT Security company that develops and integrates open source technologies, building a comprehensive open source platform, based on OSSEC, for endpoint and infrastructure security monitoring, offering professional services to support enterprise users. We are headquartered in Silicon Valley and are excited to grow our team of security engineers in the Granada office. Strong English verbal and written skills are mandatory as the majority of our accounts, including several Fortune 100 Companies, are international.

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about ArcSight Logger
Learn more about Wazuh
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText
China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Government20%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government13%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider42%
Computer Software Company19%
Government5%
Wholesaler/Distributor4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business49%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise35%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise36%
Large Enterprise45%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ArcSight Logger is ranked 14th in Log Management with 8 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 26th in Log Management with 1 review. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.4, while Wazuh is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "Passes compliance thresholds and standard requirements and has good performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "Stable with good MITRE ATT&CK correlation, but needs a better user interface". ArcSight Logger is most compared with ELK Logstash, Splunk, IBM QRadar, Graylog and LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, Graylog, AT&T AlienVault USM and Elastic Beats.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.