We performed a comparison between ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager and MetricStream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The most valuable feature is the risk testing, where you can attach your processes to the risk, and automatically generate all of the tests."
"Key features are usability and ease of configuration. It allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."
"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."
"I would like to see the modeling less strict so that connectors can be more flexible."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."
"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."
Earn 20 points
ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is ranked 29th in GRC while MetricStream is ranked 12th in GRC. ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is rated 8.0, while MetricStream is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager writes "Risk testing feature enables you to attach your processes to the risk, and automatically generate all of the tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MetricStream writes "Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support". ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas MetricStream is most compared with RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
