ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager and Thomson Reuters Accelus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
30th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
278
Comparisons
171
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
347
Comparisons
181
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Accelus
Learn More
Thomson Reuters
Video Not Available
Overview

Distance yourself from the potentially devastating risks of noncompliance. Using ARIS for risk and compliance management means you have a process-focused approach to an enterprise-wide compliance and risk management system.

ARIS can be used to implement and efficiently operate an enterprise-wide compliance and risk management system. You can protect your business from potentially devastating risks of non-compliance while reducing your costs, using a single source of truth to ensure effective enterprise operations and compliance. 

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Sample Customers
Alicorp, Tesco, Dubai Municipality, Emirates NBD, Suva - ARIS serves customers across all industries and of every size worldwide. Companies trust ARIS as being in the market of business process management for more than 30 years, serving users worldwide, from 1 user companies to the Fortune 500.
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm38%
Comms Service Provider16%
Computer Software Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is ranked 30th in GRC while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 24th in GRC. ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is rated 8.0, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager writes "Risk testing feature enables you to attach your processes to the risk, and automatically generate all of the tests". On the other hand, ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with FIS Protegent and RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.