Compare Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the networking. I didn't have a good experience with the networking that Sophos has.
Top Answer: I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it… more »
Top Answer: I would rate it a seven out of ten. It's simple to deploy, it's faster than other platforms, and it's scalable which is an important advantage. In the next release, I would like to see more… more »
Ranking
Views
387
Comparisons
313
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
280
Comparisons
217
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
335
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
Learn
Aruba Networks
Microsoft
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.

Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
Sample Customers
VERISK
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider23%
Manufacturing Company6%
Insurance Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 17th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "Has good networking and is faster than other platforms but it needs better troubleshooting features". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, F5 BIG-IP, OpenVPN Access Server and Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Pulse Connect Secure, Fortinet FortiClient, Google Cloud VPN and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.