We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It works perfectly for me. It is very user-friendly in terms of the configuration and the setup process.
Top Answer: Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer.
Top Answer: I would definitely recommend this solution because it is very easy to deploy and very stable. It is very simple. It is only a VPN connection. It works for what it is made. I would rate Microsoft Azure… more »
Ranking
Views
474
Comparisons
387
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,943
Comparisons
2,288
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
331
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
MS Azure VPN Gateway
Learn More
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.

Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
Sample Customers
VERISK
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company25%
Educational Organization10%
Insurance Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider24%
Manufacturing Company5%
Insurance Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point, Palo Alto Networks and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2021.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 27th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 11th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "Has good networking and is faster than other platforms but it needs better troubleshooting features". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Remote Access VPN, Pulse Connect Secure and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and OpenVPN Access Server.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.