We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and OpenVPN Access Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"It is much easier to scale and troubleshoot compared to regular Windows-based VPN solutions or PPTP daemon."
"It can securely do remote product updates... just as if it was on our LAN."
"The product provides secure internet connections and helps with faster downloads."
"OpenVPN Access Server provides remote secure access."
"You can do local subnet blocking."
"I like that it's easy to use, easy to download, and not hard to manage."
"The most valuable features of the OpenVPN Access Server are the ease of use and integration with different platforms, such as Android and Windows. I can use the solution on my desktop and mobile devices. Additionally, the solution is secure."
"A valuable feature for us is its ability to see the new Citrix server as a local server within the company. And it allows us to test abroad."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"The high availability deployment is not very straightforward. They can make it simpler. OpenVPN does not support some of the additional protocols that Pulse Secure and Cisco AnyConnect support. They can include support for these additional protocols."
"OpenVPN Access Server needs to have fewer updates."
"The connections could be faster and more stable."
"The logs should be made easier to read."
"This solution should improve the connection speed and the user interface. The stability of this solution should be improved as well."
"When there are too many concurrent users trying to connect at the same time, there may be a bit of a bottleneck."
"The product’s connectivity is very slow. It could be faster."
"The security needs to be improved because it was a complaint that our customers had."
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 43 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "An easy-to-use tool with which its users can access networks from home or external locations". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Ivanti Connect Secure and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.