We performed a comparison between AstrillVPN and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"I find it very convenient to connect."
"It is not at all interesting for me as a standalone product, but as a product that is integrated with FortiGate with all features, it is actually a great tool and a great experience. I had test installed FortiClient working from home. I remembered and knew which web categories were denied or allowed. All those policies were correctly reflected standalone, for example, on my laptop."
"It supports securely connections for VPN users from outside our environment during the lockdown."
"Remote connectivity is its most valuable feature."
"I think the solution is highly scalable."
"I find it very easy to configure and also very stable."
"It is very simple to use. I've used some of the others in the past, such as Cisco AnyConnect, which was a nightmare. I've used a couple of others, but FortiClient is very simple to use."
"The solution offers great stability."
"It's easy to use, easy to deploy, and I have more visibility over my network that shows which users are connected to the firewalls, which users are connected to the network, and what they're accessing."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would rate the scalability a three out of ten."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"FortiClient is not communicating with the new version of the firewall."
"One area that could be improved is cost, but you've got to pay for what you get."
"It has a horrible performance. It is one of the most unstable VPNs I have ever used."
"It would be extremely useful to have an automatic updating feature."
"The deployment status is not good in Mac devices and sometimes in Windows-based devices using GPO, like Active Directory, that are not on the local network."
"There isn't much to improve in terms of features and comparison with other vendors. It just needs to stay more up to date in catching the malware. The user interface may be improved, which would be a minor enhancement. Unlike central management, in endpoint security, the end users don't need to keep looking at the endpoint user interface. The technology is the most important thing in endpoint security."
"Initially, the support was very poor. It is getting better, but they should continue to improve this."
AstrillVPN is ranked 30th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews. AstrillVPN is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AstrillVPN writes "Bypasses internet restrictions and makes it easy to access content that may be restricted". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". AstrillVPN is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.