We performed a comparison between Atos DirX Directory and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The role and attribute-based access control has been greatly improved."
"The most valuable feature is its knowledge."
"The solution offers high performance."
"DirX Directory is the best feature of the product: a very fast, stable LDAP directory."
"The integrations are the most valuable aspect of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. The software offers pre-built integrations, and our team can also create custom connectors. This flexibility allows us to integrate with systems that we previously didn't consider integrating with, making it a significant advantage for us."
"We've written over a hundred custom connectors ourselves that allow us to do all types of privileged session management for various applications. On top of that, the rest of the API-based central credential providers allow us to get away from credentials that may be hard-coded in the script or some application."
"The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,"
"It supports lots of requirements in the privileged access management area."
"With CyberArk, you can be fully confident that your existing accounts are secure. You will be 100 percent"
"All of the features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager are valuable."
"All access to our servers by both staff and vendors is monitored and recorded."
"CyberArk has resulted in a massive increase in our security footprint."
"The Self-Service Portal is old school and it lacks easy accessibility for users."
"The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release."
"An overall modernization of the product is required in order to keep up with newer products."
"Needs more available consultants and implementation partners."
"The user interface could be more convenient for people that don't know the tool too intensively."
"The initial setup has room for improvement to be more straightforward."
"The current user interface is a little dated. However, I hear there are changes coming in the next version."
"It is very complex and difficult to set up the solution."
"The greatest area of improvement is with the user interface of the Password Vault Web Access component."
"Having a centralized place to manage the solution has been something that I have always wanted, and they are starting to understand that and bring things back together."
"Its pricing is a big challenge here. When it started, the product came in at a very low cost. Now, they are the leaders in the market, so the cost has grown and is quite huge."
"There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar."
"Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Atos DirX Directory is ranked 19th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews. Atos DirX Directory is rated 6.8, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Atos DirX Directory writes "An identity management system with valuable knowledge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". Atos DirX Directory is most compared with One Identity Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.