Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. FioranoMQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea CX Messenger Logo
1,673 views|791 comparisons
FioranoMQ Logo
37 views|14 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
37
Comparisons
14
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Learn
Aurea
Fiorano
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

FioranoMQ is a scalable, secure, and fast Java Messaging Server delivering high-performance, reliable, low latency solution for demanding enterprise applications. Fiorano’s enterprise backbone seamlessly integrates heterogeneous IT systems improving operational efficiency, business agility and performance. With comprehensive support for standards-based communication, connectivity and transformation, FioranoMQ minimizes proprietary dependencies while providing a powerful communication backbone that can be extended easily, allowing real-time delivery of data spanning multiple applications and platforms.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about FioranoMQ
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageIG Index, UC Berkeley, Schlumberger Oil Fields, Credit Agricole Titres, FairEx International Financial Systems Ptv Ltd, FinScope, Large Hedge Fund, LiquidityHub, Scottrade, Thomas Weisel Partners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commission Junction, Connect First, Flytxt, Xylo, Wireless Matrix Corp, Korea Telecom, Qwest Communications
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
International Affairs Institute12%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while FioranoMQ is ranked 16th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while FioranoMQ is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas FioranoMQ is most compared with .

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.