We performed a comparison between Avantra and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very easy to manage and use."
"You can customize alerts based on need."
"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"Profiling has been made easier."
"We like the distributed tracing and flame graphs for debugging. This has been invaluable for us during periods of high traffic or red alert conditions."
"The ease of correcting these dashboards and widgets when needed is amazing."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboards that are provided out of the box, as well as ones we were able to configure."
"I have found the logging and tracing features the most valuable."
"The biggest thing I liked was the combination of all the things - monitoring, log aggregation, and profiling."
"We have hundreds of microservices, and knowing how top-level requests weave throughout all of them is invaluable."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"We would like to see some versioning system for the Synthetic Tests so that we could have a backup of our tests since they are time-consuming to make and very easy to damage in a moment of error."
"The logging could be improved in the future."
"It lacks consistency in the APIs."
"Managing dashboards as IaC is a bit hard to work out at times."
"We would like to see smaller or shorter tutorials and video sessions."
"It would be ideal if the product offered a bit more monitoring from our dashboard."
"We need more visibility into the error tracking dashboard."
"Even though it is powerful on its own, the UI-based design lacks elegance, efficiency, and complexity."
Avantra is ranked 38th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Avantra is rated 8.6, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Avantra is most compared with AppDynamics, Dynatrace and OpsRamp, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics. See our Avantra vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.