We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and ServiceNow Cloud Observability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"The UI is very intuitive."
"The ability to create a stream based on different parameters, operation name, service name, URL, tags, and URI part, is one valuable feature."
"The solution Lightstep/ServiceNow has a couple of pretty advanced functionalities to help us investigate a deviation and help the development teams have better observability in the environment using distributed and complex services."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The tool must include AI features."
"The solution must improve automation."
"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"The tool's stability could be improved."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"The dashboard and graphics must be improved."
"The support team could be better. Because of the different versions of different tactics of integrating reactive code base, the documentation is not very clear if someone has to be onboard. I would rate the documentation of Lightstep a five out of ten. It could need improvement."
"The design of this solution is not very intuitive and probably could come with more friendly tips for beginners."
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while ServiceNow Cloud Observability is ranked 48th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while ServiceNow Cloud Observability is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Cloud Observability writes "Provides effective observability and offers robust alerting and monitoring capabilities". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow Cloud Observability is most compared with Grafana, New Relic, Dynatrace, Datadog and Elastic Observability. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
