We performed a comparison between AWS Cost Management [EOL] and Azure Cost Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."The budgeting tool of AWS Cost Management is the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup wasn't complex at all."
"With the cost management tool, clients can optimize fine tuning their consumption."
"The stability and scalability are good."
"All of the reporting features are very good, as they allow us to track monthly expenses and send relevant emails."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's not complex at all."
"The product provides the ability to set cost limits and budgets for a set of resources on the network."
"I like the recommendation we get from AWS Cost Management to use a particular image or VM type."
"Microsoft's technical support is good."
"The tool is very stable."
"The solution helps us diagnose and understand why some resources cost more so that we can fine-tune and reduce the cost."
"The tool helps with budgeting and reporting. It notifies us whenever we cross the threshold."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure Cost Management for me is the cost-saving recommendations based on our usage patterns."
"The most valuable feature is that our customers can see their consumption in real time. Even though we have a couple of analytics provided by our company, those are not in real time."
"The interface is good, and it's easy to manage."
"It encompasses a multitude of specialized services, each with its associated costs and considerations."
"There could be an option to build custom dashboards for the platform."
"I would like to see the forecasting models improved with AWS Cost Management."
"The solution needs to improve the communication mechanism available to the stakeholders."
"AWS could improve the compatibility with other products."
"AWS Cost Management has fewer features compared to Azure Cost Management."
"This program is not very scalable."
"I would like to see AWS Cost Management be more precise in their calculations."
"Data transfer between S3 buckets within AWS incurs costs, especially when moving data from one bucket to another or downloading data."
"It would be beneficial if Azure Cost Management could automatically generate budget rules using AI insights, eliminating the need for manual configuration."
"The response time of customer support can be improved."
"I would like the developers to add more features about migration, like how much it would cost to migrate from, let's say, AWS to Azure."
"Azure Cost Management should be made cheaper."
"The solution could improve its APIs to access the customer application."
"The forecasting model can improve Azure Cost Management."
"Azure Cost Management is expensive."
"The solution could use automatic emailing. That would help improve the product a lot, at least for our purposes."
AWS Cost Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Cost Management with 10 reviews while Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews. AWS Cost Management [EOL] is rated 8.2, while Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Cost Management [EOL] writes "Easy to use and provides in-depth information in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". AWS Cost Management [EOL] is most compared with VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Cloudability, Google Cloud Billing and CloudCheckr , whereas Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, AWS Savings Plans, Cloudability and Zabbix.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
