Compare Azure Backup vs. Dell EMC NetWorker

Azure Backup is ranked 13th in Backup and Recovery Software with 10 reviews while Dell EMC NetWorker is ranked 16th in Backup and Recovery Software with 10 reviews. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while Dell EMC NetWorker is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Secure, good connectivity, easy to scale, and gives our clients peace of mind". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell EMC NetWorker writes "The best feature is the DR replication for us. But, the implementation was difficult". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Dell EMC NetWorker is most compared with Dell EMC Avamar, Veeam Backup & Replication and Commvault. See our Azure Backup vs. Dell EMC NetWorker report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Commvault Logo
34,287 views|23,543 comparisons
Azure Backup Logo
1,655 views|1,389 comparisons
Dell EMC NetWorker Logo
9,558 views|7,733 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anat Amar
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. Dell EMC NetWorker and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Among the best features are the BMR (Bare Metal Recovery), Live Sync, and IntelliSnap, which is used for snapshots of hypervisor storage. It's predefined so you only need to enable it and it works. I haven't seen anything like this in other backup tools like Veritas NetBackup or Dell EMC or TSM. We will use snapshotting for all our machines.All workloads can be integrated with Commvault. If we use a new technology, Commvault integrates with it. Commvault is a data management solution with support for building the DR side of things. With Commvault we can rapidly back up and restore any application we add to our environment.Commvault has support for backing up operating systems and servers.We use Commvault Command Center for backups and restores and for the creation of new clients. We use it for other functionalities as well. In terms of VMware, I can go directly to the Command Center, enter VMware, and I can search it directly. Command Center is very useful and it can be used for more advanced techniques.The most important feature is that everything can be controlled using a single console.It provides us a good holistic view of everything that we have backed up so far. It also provides us all the recovery points. If we look at an an object that has been backed up, we can tell how many retention copies it has, how far we can go, and recover any data, if needed.The solution's interface is easy to use. For manageability, it doesn't matter where the resource is coming from or going to. That's the great power of the Control Panel: It's easy to use and does not matter if you manage on-prem or cloud resources.I'm a big fan of the reporting. You can build your own reports; it's very customizable. You can have individual reports going to groups of people or individuals. You can have them go out multiple times a day. It's basically a free-for-all as far as reporting goes. If anybody wants a specific job report every day, you can build it, schedule it, and have it go out and never touched it again. It's pretty nice.

Read more »

I have no issues with the stability at all. So I don't necessarily care about the stability of the product. I look more at whether or not can I recover. And I haven't had a failed recovery yet. I've got no failed recoveries of all my years.First of all, you can schedule a backup for the client. You can schedule it as you like. You can also control the bandwidth, so the backup will not utilize. The internet will depend on the bandwidth.Azure Backup is good because it is entirely cloud-based, which means that you can be 99.9% sure that your backup is safe.It is easy to schedule backups.It's very simple to configure which is very useful. It's not complex to configure it.The fact that Azure Backup is integrated is one of its biggest advantages.One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data.The backup features are very useful.

Read more »

I feel that it is a good product.The backup software has been much faster since we've deployed the solution.The solution has minimized the recovery time objective, and the recovery point objective, the RTO and RPO. Most customers are looking for to minimize downtime. The solution has helped ensure this.Technical support for this solution is very good.NetWorker has very good scalability.The solution is very stable, especially if you are using a RAC environment.The most valuable features for us at the moment are NFS, file system backup, and IP backup.When it was required that data had to be restored for our customer, it was accomplished successfully and this has kept our end users satisfied.

Read more »

Cons
They should move the CommServe outside of Windows machines and the database should be distributed among servers. It's still a single point of failure.One issue we face is the complexity of the console. That could be improved on. It takes users time to get familiar with Commvault. On average, it takes our customers between one and three months to learn it. The console and the way you configure Commvault have very advanced settings. It takes time to understand how it works.There is room for improvement in terms of data security.I need documentation for Azure backups. One expectation that I have is regarding PDF documentation. When I was trying to browse the documentation, I could not locate that.I would like them not to push Command Center. It is good, but I would like them to enable all the features for the Java console. Some things are not in the Java console, like Office 365 agents. In fact, they are there, but one of the engineers had to show me how to configure it. It's not done the same as in the Command Center.It does not have an easy deployment. The deployment is not something that just anybody can go in and deploy.The solution's breadth and depth of cloud support are good, but could be better. Some cloud features that are common-sense, especially on AWS, are not completely integrated yet in the product. They are a work-in-progress.Command Center definitely gives us a complete view of our data. But finding some of the granular, very small items that we sometimes have to find, such as auxiliary copies for tapes, I still find that it's easier to navigate and, sometimes, only possible to find them using the CommCell tool.

Read more »

On-prem can be complex to set up but the cloud is simple.It doesn't have the option to have a backup from the database. It has backup for the files, folders, and backup only the whole virtual machine. But if I need to do a backup from the Oracle database, from an Exchange server or from SharePoint, this ability isn't there. There is no application backup.The compression ratio of the backup data should be improved.Technical support is in need of improvement.To make it a ten, it should have the ability to extend the retention and to perform a copy of the data outside of the subscription - with no additional costs.In the next release, I would like to see the ability to back up to different cloud providers.We would like to see some kind of notification given to the user that a file was not synchronized well or what may have happened.The solution is still in its infancy; it's not a mature product yet.

Read more »

There are too many reboots and the software requires constant updating.I haven't had a good experience with technical support. It takes them a very long time to resolve issues.It's not easy to integrate. We have to read a lot of documentation in order to configure the solution.We are able to do direct backups, but analyzing the logs is not straightforward.The deduplication needs improvement and it could use better integration.The software also isn't user-friendly like Convault or Rubrik. The solution errors and management aren't so good in comparison.We are looking forward to better stability in future versions.We would like support for tape space reclaim, using either the same or another pool.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The complete license gives us options for all the features. Commvault does not license based on storage or the management components. It can integrate with any storage vendor. That means that when we are out of storage and need more, we can integrate without additional licensing. In my opinion, Commvault needs to reduce the licensing cost by 20 to 40 percent to make it cost-efficient.Commvault licensing is a perpetual license so only the support is being renewed yearly.There is a bit of cost involved with signing up the entire solution. It's not a cheap solution.Our cost is around $20,000 per month. The previous year, it was around $30,000 per month. It now costs less because Commvault changed the licensing type for providers.Our yearly cost is around €20,000... The cost is based on the number of users and the amount of data. They sell it per terabyte.The price could perhaps be lower as well.In my experience, compared to solutions like Veritas and Veeam, while they do have their technical pluses and minuses, Commvault can save you on average forty percent initially, and then twenty to twenty-five percent annually.Compared to other competitors and vendors the pricing is fair.

Read more »

The price is pretty good, maybe $30 for a machine, I can't complain.We are paying about $100,000 USD per year, just for a couple of servers.This is an expensive solution in the Bangladesh marketplace.Support payment works by the level of partnership and the number of shares.The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.

Read more »

The pricing of this solution is very good.It's approximate, but I believe we pay around $20-30,000 a month in licensing.You have to buy the deduplication software separately from the license.Low cost is key.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
NetWorker
Learn
Commvault
Microsoft
Dell EMC
Overview

Commvault can help you transform your data into a powerful strategic asset, with data protection and information management solutions that enable you to protect, access and use all of your data anywhere and anytime.

Data is the heart of any organization and backing up this data is a key part of a business strategy. Azure Backup is a scalable solution with zero capital investment and minimal operational expense. With the optional integration with System Center Data Protection Manager, you can protect advanced workloads running in your datacenter in VMs or on physical servers.

EMC NetWorker backup and recovery software centralizes, automates, and accelerates data backup and recovery across your IT environment. NetWorker delivers record-breaking performance and a wide range of data protection options to safeguard your critical business data.
Offer
Learn more about Commvault
Learn more about Azure Backup
Learn more about Dell EMC NetWorker
Sample Customers
Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance, Alliant Credit Union, American Municipal Power, American Pacific Mortgage, AstraZeneca, Dongbu Steel, Denver Health, Dow Jones, Emirates Steel, Penn State Health, Prime Healthcare, Sonic Healthcare, Sony Network Communications, TiVO, UCONN Health, The Weitz CompanyRussell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL ConstructionSecure-24, Riverside Health System, Shriners, Panatonni, Qatar Islamic Bank, Eurosport
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider20%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Government10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government7%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company45%
Healthcare Company8%
Comms Service Provider8%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Healthcare Company22%
Comms Service Provider11%
Engineering Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company7%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise77%
REVIEWERS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise22%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. Dell EMC NetWorker and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.