We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."You can select the tiering for your backup and manage your cost."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is the file recovery and file vault."
"Enables immediate recovery and immediate restoration."
"The storage backup is very efficient."
"All of the core features are valuable to us."
"It's useful, it works, and it's fairly reliable."
"Azure Backup is very simple to use and user-friendly."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"The most valuable feature is the backups."
"I like that they have some new devices that are simpler to use because they kind of tie right into the cloud."
"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved."
"The tool's backup should be faster. Azure Backup's support should be faster."
"I would like to see more automation, integration, and security. The price could be better."
"We have a concern with the backup when were are working with VMs that are running in Barracuda Firewall because it usually fails."
"The solution is still in its infancy; it's not a mature product yet."
"While Azure Backup allows ingress data, the egress data is chargeable, which should be excluded."
"Azure lacks sufficient solutions for a particular scenario, we may need to resort to using third-party applications. In such cases, these applications can be employed to facilitate backup, replication, and the efficient utilization of internet connectivity and bandwidth. They enable us to effectively manage and transfer data while ensuring optimal utilization of network resources. However, it would be a benefit if we did not have to use third-party applications for these operations."
"The product must improve on a database level."
"StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery."
"Their restoration protocols could be better. I pulled all my clients out of their cloud mostly because I wasn't confident that they could restore out of the cloud. This was backed up by friends who had been burned by stuff like that. We moved away because of the lack of resources to restore from a potential catastrophic failure. It's challenging, and in some cases, they couldn't do it because they didn't have enough resources. For example, if there was a major disaster, and everybody needed their images out of the cloud, they couldn't give them to everybody."
More StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 50 reviews while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] writes "An expensive next-generation data recovery and backup software solution with poor data restoration". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.