Compare Azure Cost Management vs. Coupa Invoice

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
8,422 views|4,173 comparisons
Azure Cost Management Logo
2,192 views|1,894 comparisons
Coupa Invoice Logo
381 views|262 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Turbonomic, an IBM company, VMware, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does.""It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year.""I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive.""We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective.""When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for.""I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault.""It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive.""The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's free out of the box.""I think the solution was free initially.""Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better."

More Azure Cost Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will… more »
Top Answer: There is an opportunity for improvement with some of Turbonomic's permissions internally for role-based access control… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use it as a cost reduction tool regarding our cloud spend in Azure, as far as performance optimization or… more »
Top Answer: We don't actually use the Azure Cost Management features. We have our own capabilities. We put our own technology on top… more »
Top Answer: Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better.
Top Answer: The policy-based remediation is probably the biggest area where Azure is lacking and that's why we sell a lot of our… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
VMTurbo Operations Manager
Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn
Learn More
Overview

Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides Application Resource Management (ARM) software used by customers to assure application performance and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multicloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers and managed services providers.

For further information, please visit www.turbonomic.com

www.turbonomic.com/resources/case-studies

Azure Cost Management empowers organizations to monitor cloud spend, drive organizational accountabilities, and optimize cloud efficiency so they can accelerate future cloud investments with confidence.

Rescue your accounts payable department from a sea of paper with efficient, accurate, and timely invoice processing. With our invoice management system software, Coupa Invoice, you automate manual work, eliminate paper, and shorten cycles—freeing your accounts payable team to add strategic value.

Offer
Learn more about Turbonomic
Learn more about Azure Cost Management
Learn more about Coupa Invoice
Sample Customers
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, ANZ, Credit Suisse, State Street, Morningstar, VOYA, TPICAP, LPL Financial, Cisco, BMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Agilysys, MetLife, Hiscox, Humana, Tokio Marine, Allscripts, SHARP, Providence St. Joseph Health, NBC Universal, pwc, KPMG, Wayfair, Carhartt, Tiffany & Co., UCLA, NASA, NIH
Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware
Sanofi, Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Amerinet, Armstrong Worldwide Industries, Auction.com, FirstMerit Bank, Grass Valley, Intermedia, NEC, NPL, ON24, Pandora, SCI, CSAA Insurance Group, World Vision
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm12%
Media Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise51%
Large Enterprise31%
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Large Enterprise92%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Turbonomic, an IBM company, VMware, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Cost Management is ranked 3rd in Cloud Cost Management with 9 reviews while Coupa Invoice is ranked 8th in Billing Software. Azure Cost Management is rated 7.4, while Coupa Invoice is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "Good reporting and ideal for small to medium-sized companies but needs better policy-based remediation". On the other hand, Azure Cost Management is most compared with AWS Savings Plans, CloudHealth, CloudCheckr CMx High Security, Cloudability and ScienceLogic, whereas Coupa Invoice is most compared with IBM Maximo, NetSuite ERP and Salesforce Quote-to-Cash.

See our list of .

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.