We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I use the solution to monitor the infrastructure and applications."
"Technical support is good and helpful...The initial setup is easy."
"It has good troubleshooting features."
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."
"Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."
"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"If it is configured incorrectly, you can end up with a huge bill."
"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."
"The monitoring of Kubernetes clusters needs improvement to be on par with competitors."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"It might not have all of the capabilities we will need."
"Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful."
"The price could be lower but it is not a must."
"As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with . See our Azure Monitor vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
