We performed a comparison between Barracuda Message Archiver and KerioConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Veritas, Barracuda Networks and others in Email Archiving."It's easy to use."
"The user interface is good."
"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."
"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."
"It's relatively simple to use."
"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."
"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."
"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful."
"It's a little bit more expensive than the others."
"The user mailbox management is poor."
"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"
"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc."
"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."
"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."
"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."
"I would like to see better support from their support team."
"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."
Barracuda Message Archiver is ranked 5th in Email Archiving with 2 reviews while KerioConnect is ranked 8th in Email Archiving with 7 reviews. Barracuda Message Archiver is rated 7.6, while KerioConnect is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Barracuda Message Archiver writes "Easy to use and doesn't require any maintenance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KerioConnect writes "Lightweight, simple, and robust; easy to maintain and doesn't require a lot of system resources to run". Barracuda Message Archiver is most compared with , whereas KerioConnect is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Zimbra Collaboration, IceWarp, Microsoft Exchange Online and Google Workspace.
See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.
We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
