Compare Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Check Point Endpoint Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Check Point Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"I like the simplicity of this solution and the fact that it saves us time. The deployment was really straightforward and useful and I am impressed by the anti-virus endpoint detection and response offered by this solution.""The solution has exchange protection. It has a content control, device control, a firewall, and anti-malware as well. They are all quite valuable features for us.""The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature."

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Pros »

"It provides remote access for the staff and increases their productivity.""The end-user facilities for managing the tool are good.""The SandBlast agent is the most valuable feature for Check Point Endpoint Security. We've found that the Check Point SandBlast agent is mature.""Before we used this solution, our mail was blacklisted. Now we are white listed by all organizations, including Google. Also the security of our institution has really improved.""We had a ransomware attack and the SandBlast agent automatically picked up the ransomware.""The most valuable feature is the integration with CheckPoint's firewalls. You can have one port, and follow the logs from both Endpoint and firewall security.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the VPN.""The biggest value we found was ease of deployment. I haven't really used it much, so I can't really comment beyond that. I haven't used it much, but it's working."

More Check Point Endpoint Security Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"There are blurred lines between anti-virus and endpoint detection so I would say it can be confusing when you are considering buying this program. I would like to see that being explained better to the customer.""There needs to be better integration with the environment. Especially, for the active directory and also for keeping up with the changes from Microsoft. We use a lot of Microsoft OS. I have noted that sometimes they lag behind Microsoft updates. For example, when with Windows 10. I had some issues with deploying to Windows 10 because the solution was behind in updating their own services to match the Microsoft release.""The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit."

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Cons »

"A couple of times, we experienced some sales issues.""Areas that have room for improvement are the scope of the product and, while I think the support is good, they can improve support as well.""The remote deployment with Check Point Endpoint Security requires improvement. We have to depend on some of their deployment tools. I would like a system endpoint protection management tool or a remote deployment tool.""They should provide bandwidth regulation, so we can monitor and regulate bandwidth.""One area of this product that has room for improvement is the disc encryption.""The solution could improve VPN functionality and the VPN user-interface.""I would like to see support for a policy in the appliance that will refuse to create a connection if it does not detect an active virus scanner.""I'd also love to see them add full MDM support, but I appreciate that that's not the product market. If it did come in, I'd be more than happy to look at additional modules. It was probably one of the easiest products I've ever had to deploy it, but if it's not capable of doing MD, then that's going to impact its usefulness to us."

More Check Point Endpoint Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There's a yearly cost for licensing. For us, that comes to $1,400. There are no additional costs beyond the license itself."

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Pricing and Cost Advice »

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there is a cost for support.""We pay on an annual basis. There are no additional fees, they mostly tell us what we have to pay. We have budgeted for it.""We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month.""I bought them for 12 months and I genuinely cannot remember what I paid for them. I think it's about 100 pounds per user per year, so about 10 pounds a month per person.""The licensing cost for Check Point is $3 USD or $4 USD per end-user."

More Check Point Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Top Answer: The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature.
Top Answer: I believe we bought the solution on a three-year license. There are no additional costs above the standard licensing… more »
Top Answer: The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit. Technical support needs a lot of improvement.
Top Answer: We were under an attack in our environment, and the Check Point response was good because we didn't lose anything.
Top Answer: The licensing cost for Check Point is $3 USD or $4 USD per end-user.
Top Answer: The antivirus is not as friendly as other solutions and can be improved. We would like to have the ability to stop and… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HVIEndpoint Security
Learn
Cisco
Bitdefender
Check Point
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection (HVI) is the first security solution that is able to uncover memory violations that endpoint security tools sometimes miss by directly analyzing raw memory lines - thereby ensuring they are not being altered by malware.

Check Point SandBlast Agent is a complete endpoint security solution offering a fleet of advanced endpoint threat prevention capabilities so you can safely navigate today’s menacing threat landscape.It provides a comprehensive system to proactively prevent, detect, and remediate evasive malware attacks. SandBlast Agent is a core product of Check Point Infinity, creating a unified security architecture. Learn more about Endpoint Security.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection
Learn more about Check Point Endpoint Security
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankKansas Development Finance Authority (KDFA), QuilvestBoston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company21%
Government14%
Reseller7%
Non Profit7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government6%
Construction Company4%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Healthcare Company25%
Real Estate/Law Firm13%
Comms Service Provider13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government7%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Check Point Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is ranked 34th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 3 reviews while Check Point Endpoint Security is ranked 14th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 12 reviews. Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is rated 7.4, while Check Point Endpoint Security is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection writes "An excellent endpoint protection that's scalable and reasonably priced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Endpoint Security writes "Very easy to deploy and has good stability". Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, Kaspersky Endpoint Security, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Security, whereas Check Point Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Microsoft Windows Defender, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet FortiClient. See our Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Check Point Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.