We compared CrowdStrike Falcon and Fortinet FortiEDR based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its strong threat detection capabilities, advanced technology, and effective incident response, with user-friendly interface and proactive threat hunting. Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced threat detection, efficient security, and seamless integration, with emphasis on improving user interface and usability. CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on real-time monitoring, while Fortinet FortiEDR highlights flexible deployment options and scalability.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon stands out for its robust threat detection, advanced machine learning, and proactive threat hunting capabilities. Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced threat detection, efficient endpoint security, and flexible deployment options with scalability.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for CrowdStrike Falcon is described as straightforward and hassle-free, requiring minimal effort. Users appreciate the flexible and customizable licensing options. Meanwhile, Fortinet FortiEDR also offers a straightforward setup process with minimal effort required. Customers are satisfied with the flexibility and options provided for licensing., CrowdStrike Falcon delivers significant ROI with improved cybersecurity and threat detection capabilities, while Fortinet FortiEDR also provides positive ROI according to user feedback.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could improve its user interface, reporting capabilities, integration options, detection accuracy, customer support, and system performance. Fortinet FortiEDR could benefit from enhancements in its user interface, setup process, documentation, training resources, reporting capabilities, and dashboards.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for CrowdStrike Falcon indicate that the duration to establish the tech solution varies among users, with some taking three months for deployment and others only needing a week for setup. In contrast, Fortinet FortiEDR has users reporting either three months for deployment and an additional week for setup or just one week for both., Users highly praised the customer service of CrowdStrike Falcon, finding the team responsive, knowledgeable, and reliable. On the other hand, customers expressed satisfaction with Fortinet FortiEDR's customer service, noting excellent assistance and guidance.
The summary above is based on 70 interviews we conducted recently with CrowdStrike Falcon and Fortinet FortiEDR users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It helps us to identify the threats according to the behavior of any process that is running on any particular system. It helps immensely to identify any malicious behavior on any endpoints."
"The features we showcase to potential customers are prevention, malware protection, zero-day protection, and application scripting. Vulnerability assessment is another valuable feature."
"CrowdStrike enables the infrastructure managers to visualize all the events and get information about the network."
"The most valuable feature is that we don't need to re-image machines as much as we had to."
"The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is its accuracy."
"It has an extremely low footprint, so it has got minimum impact on the user end points in terms of CPU and memory usage."
"Cyberattack detection is very good. We use it for detecting different vulnerabilities, such as ransomware, virus, and malware. It is a good product today when compared to Symantec that we used previously."
"CrowdStrike Falcon is a very light solution. It does not use too much processor or RAM."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The portal can be clunky to navigate at times and has room for improvement."
"CrowdStrike Falcon sometimes wrongly flags things as malicious. Let's say a user is active on Chrome only. Sometimes, our cross-segmenting will fetch from the backend data and show that it is malicious because of memory or CPU utilization."
"We sometimes get false positives."
"I've found that CrowdStrike's technical support could benefit from increased technical expertise."
"Technical support could be better than what is currently offered."
"The dashboard area must be improved. We have integration with Splunk, and we are creating a dashboard there. Their dashboard area must be up to date. It should have more details and more options to create the reports and things like that."
"The solution could improve by providing more types of reports because it's in the detection span you cannot re-export anything. If it could be exported to a CSV file directly there it would help a lot. I currently need to do this by API to get what I need."
"We can't do scanning audits or device blocking or application control."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The solution is not stable."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 105 reviews while Fortinet FortiEDR is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 30 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Fortinet FortiEDR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiEDR writes "A proactive solution that works as a proactive upgrade from a firewall". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
