CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs CylancePROTECT comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk Logo
1,568 views|1,081 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
BlackBerry Logo
6,206 views|4,680 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and CylancePROTECT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT Report (Updated: May 2022).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically.""It offers great performance.""The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management.""It has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege. We've removed, at this point, close to 98 percent of the local administrative accounts on workstations. If there were an incident, it would stop at that point and we'd be able to know.""What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition.""The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers.""Users can scale the solution.""The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pros →

"It provides good insight into the programs, applications, or websites that may need attention.""We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting.""I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats.""I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part.""I find the actual overall endpoint malware protection the most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT.""It is extremely simple to manage and deploy.""​Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push.​""CylancePROTECT is very stable - we've had no issues with performance and no errors or bugs."

More CylancePROTECT Pros →

Cons
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent.""The solution is very expensive.""One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices.""It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage.""For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days.""The tool should be more user-friendly.""Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources.""CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Cons →

"​It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now.""The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly.""It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat.""I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices.""I would like to see a better UI in terms of sifting through more specific data and providing analytics. A little bit more would be nice.""The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement.""It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated.""CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."

More CylancePROTECT Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."
  • "I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."
  • "Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."
  • "The cost for CyberArk is very high."
  • "The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."
  • "The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
  • "We pay about $17 per user."
  • "CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."
  • More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."
  • "The initial end-point cost may seem a little high (~$55/device/year) but when you look at the total peace of mind that the solution provides, with no reboots for updates, and negligible performance impact, it is well worth it."
  • "​Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."
  • "Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc.​"
  • "Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user."
  • "I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."
  • "The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."
  • More CylancePROTECT Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpoint… more »
    Top Answer:The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it… more »
    Top Answer:It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point.
    Top Answer:I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part.
    Top Answer:The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market. There are other competitors of CylancePROTECT in the market who have been keeping the prices of their… more »
    Top Answer:The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be more competitive.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,568
    Comparisons
    1,081
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    613
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    6,206
    Comparisons
    4,680
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    437
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Viewfinity
    Blackberry Protect
    Learn More
    Overview

    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

    Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

    Blackberry Protect is a next generation artificial intelligence (AI) based endpoint protection platform (EPP) that prevents breaches and provides added controls for safeguarding against sophisticated cyberthreats. It uses predictive analysis to quickly and accurately find even the most advanced threats before they ever take place. Blackberry Protect’s cloud-based supercomputer mines hundreds of millions of files from all over the cloud, allowing it to predict and stop any hacker dead in their tracks.

    Blackberry Protect runs on a lightweight agent and requires no internet connection. Instead of taking up massive amounts of computing power, it typically requires less than 1% of a system’s available computing resources. In addition, it only needs to be upgraded if the model is improved, which means that you can run it on your local servers and have constant and uninterrupted access to it.

    Benefits of Blackberry Protect

    Some of the benefits of using Blackberry Protect include:

    • The use of advanced AI analytics to provide extremely fast protection. The solution scans any and all applications that attempt to execute commands in your system. If it determines that the application is a threat, then it will respond to the threatening action within milliseconds. The anti-viral software will cancel or disallow any actions that the application attempts to initiate.
    • Minimizing of potential threats by cutting off the access of unauthorized devices. Blackberry Protect allows users to determine which devices are allowed to run on their network. It enforces the security rules that your system administrators set and denies hackers the ability to penetrate your system through unapproved devices.
    • Uses less computing power while still providing your system with a robust level of protection. Blackberry Protect runs on a lightweight agent that requires you to devote a fraction of the computing power that similar solutions require. This ensures that your system does not have to sacrifice security for processing power.

    Reviews from Real Users

    The Blackberry Protect software stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms that the solution uses to detect and deal with threats and the ability to scale your level of protection according to your needs.

    PeerSpot user Donald D., the owner of Terra Controls, notes the value of having both artificial intelligence and machine learning in a single product when he writes, “The most valuable feature is the AI and ML-based virus protection that does not rely on signature-based detection methods. The way this product works is that it does not go to a central server to pick up the latest virus definitions. Instead, it's a processor-powered search that checks to see if anything out of the ordinary is running on your machine. It looks for anomalies and cancels processes that do not look normal. For example, if a program tries to read the registry and then make a change, but it hasn't been authorized, then it is assumed to be a bad actor and the process is canceled or the action is disallowed.”

    PeerSpot user Orlando B., Head of Systems at SKN Caribecafe Ltda, noted how this program is not a one-size-fits-all solution when he writes, “The solution is very good at quickly and easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and server. It's very easy to control and to see what is happening with each computer. It's very easy to choose which computer I can look at and check.”

    Sample Customers
    Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Wholesaler/Distributor9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Security Firm12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business68%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    Buyer's Guide
    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT report.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.